And Justice for All: Determinants and Effects of Probation Officers' Processing Decisions Regarding First-Time Juvenile Offenders

被引:15
|
作者
Fine, Adam [1 ]
Donley, Sachiko [1 ]
Cavanagh, Caitlin [2 ]
Miltimore, Sarah [1 ]
Steinberg, Laurence [3 ,4 ]
Frick, Paul J. [5 ,6 ]
Cauffman, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Psychol & Social Behav, 4308 Social & Behav Sci Gateway, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Sch Criminal Justice, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Temple Univ, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[4] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Psychol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[5] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Psychol, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[6] Australian Catholic Univ, Learning Sci Inst Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
processing decisions; juvenile probation; juvenile justice; RACIAL DISPARITIES; YOUTH DISCOUNT; COURT; IMPACT; LEGAL; RACE; SYSTEM; INCARCERATION; DISPOSITION; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1037/law0000113
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
When a youth is accused of committing a crime, juvenile justice system arbiters, such as probation officers, interview both the youth and the youth's guardian to gather information before deciding to either process the youth formally or informally. Factors about a youth that are unrelated to the criminal charge may contribute to arbiters' processing decisions. Such extralegal factors include demographic characteristics and characteristics of the youth's context (e.g., home environment, peer delinquency). Little is known about how extralegal factors other than age and race affect youth processing. The present study draws on data from probation officer assessment interviews with 359 male, first-time, low-level juvenile offenders, as well as longitudinal self-report and official records of a youth's reoffending after his first arrest, to determine how extralegal factors affect probation processing decisions, and whether processing is associated with youth reoffending and rearrest. The results indicate that even after taking into account legal factors and demographic characteristics, youth are more likely to be processed formally if they refuse to comment on the charge, if their probation officers believe their guardians to be relatively more disapproving of their friends, and if their probation officers perceive their home environments to be more problematic. Although youth who are processed formally self-report reoffending at the same rate as youth who are processed informally, youth who are processed formally are more likely to be rearrested in the subsequent 6 months. Implications for how processing decisions may promote sustained involvement in the juvenile justice system are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 116
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] First-Time Violent Juvenile Offenders: Probation, Placement, and Recidivism
    Ryan, Joseph P.
    Abrams, Laura S.
    Huang, Hui
    SOCIAL WORK RESEARCH, 2014, 38 (01) : 7 - 18
  • [2] Factors involved in decisions on commitment to delinquency programs for first-time juvenile offenders
    Fader, JJ
    Harris, PW
    Jones, PR
    Poulin, ME
    JUSTICE QUARTERLY, 2001, 18 (02) : 323 - 341
  • [3] A multiple family group intervention for first-time juvenile offenders: Comparisons with probation and dropouts on recidivism
    Quinn, WH
    Van Dyke, DJ
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 32 (02) : 177 - 200
  • [4] In Pursuit of the Ideal Parent in Juvenile Justice: A Qualitative Investigation of Probation Officers' Experiences with Parents of Juvenile Offenders
    Maschi, Tina
    Schwalbe, Craig
    Ristow, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION, 2013, 52 (07) : 470 - 492
  • [5] Disparities in Criminal Justice System Responses to First-Time Juvenile Offenders According to Indigenous Status
    Papalia, Nina
    Shepherd, Stephane M.
    Spivak, Benjamin
    Luebbers, Stefan
    Shea, Daniel E.
    Fullam, Rachael
    CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2019, 46 (08) : 1067 - 1087
  • [6] A comparison of first-time offenders, repeat offenders, and frequent utilizers of the criminal justice system
    Stolzenberg, Lisa
    D'Alessio, Stewart J.
    Kutateladze, Besiki L.
    Lawson, Victoria Z.
    JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2024, 94
  • [7] THE EFFECTS OF A PROBATION INTERVENTION ON JUVENILE-OFFENDERS SELF-CONCEPTS, LOCI OF CONTROL, AND PERCEPTIONS OF JUVENILE JUSTICE
    MINOR, KI
    ELROD, P
    YOUTH & SOCIETY, 1994, 25 (04) : 490 - 511
  • [8] The Point of Diminishing Returns in Juvenile Probation: Probation Requirements and Risk of Technical Probation Violations Among First-Time Probation-Involved Youth
    Dir, Allyson L.
    Magee, Lauren A.
    Clifton, Richelle L.
    Ouyang, Fangqian
    Tu, Wanzhu
    Wiehe, Sarah E.
    Aalsma, Matthew C.
    PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2021, 27 (02) : 283 - 291
  • [9] The Longitudinal Association of Relationship Quality and Reoffending Among First-Time Juvenile Offenders and Their Mothers
    Cavanagh, Caitlin
    Cauffman, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 2017, 46 (07) : 1533 - 1546
  • [10] Prevalence of Mental Health Problems and Service Use Among First-Time Juvenile Offenders
    Burke, Jeffrey D.
    Mulvey, Edward P.
    Schubert, Carol A.
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2015, 24 (12) : 3774 - 3781