Modeling sideswipe in 2D oceanic seismic surveys from sonar data:: Application to the Mariana arc

被引:5
|
作者
Gunther, Roland H.
Klemperer, Simon L.
Goodliffe, Andrew M.
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Geophys, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Dept Geol Sci, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
sideswipe; sonar; seismic reflection; Mariana arc;
D O I
10.1016/j.tecto.2006.01.027
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
In two-dimensional (2D) marine seismic-reflection surveys, out-of-plane rough seafloor bathymetry can cause multiple ocean-bottom reflections that complicate the interpretation of shallow reflections. Although migration corrects for the in-plane position of reflectors, it cannot resolve the inherent ambiguity in their out-of-plane positions. We show how swath bathymetry, routinely collected in many such surveys, can be used to model out-of-plane seafloor reflections and prevent their misinterpretation as subsurface geology. We use both raw and gridded multi-beam bathymetry data to build images that represent seafloor reflections in migrated seismic data. Comparison of these images to the seismic sections reveals whether suspicious features are out-of-plane water bottom reflections or subsurface reflections. Multi-channel seismic surveys across the Marianas intra-oceanic arc system provide examples where rough seafloor topography produced reflections that were initially misinterpreted. We use our seafloor reflection modeling (SRM) approach to help distinguish a possible landslide from a volcanic cone, to help distinguish real from apparent fault-plane reflections bounding a sediment-filled basin, and to verify that a possible magma chamber reflection results from sub-surface structure, not seafloor sideswipe. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 343
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MARIANA ARC STRUCTURE INFERRED FROM GRAVITY AND SEISMIC DATA
    SAGER, WW
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1980, 85 (NB10): : 5382 - 5388
  • [2] The application of graph theory to optimize the design of onshore 2D seismic surveys
    Dean T.
    Leading Edge, 2023, 42 (10): : 711 - 717
  • [3] 3D seismic interpretation and forward modeling - an approach to providing reliable results from 2D seismic data
    Ahmadi, Omid
    Hedin, Peter
    Malehmir, Alireza
    Juhlin, Christopher
    MINERAL DEPOSIT RESEARCH FOR A HIGH-TECH WORLD, VOLS. 1-4, 2013, : 50 - 53
  • [4] Occupancy Grid Mapping from 2D SONAR Data for Underwater Scenes
    Nunes, Alexandra
    Gaspar, Ana Rita
    Matos, Anibal
    OCEANS 2021: SAN DIEGO - PORTO, 2021,
  • [5] TRANSVERSE 2D GLIDING ARC MODELING
    Gutsol, Alexander F.
    Gangoli, Shailesh
    2016 43RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PLASMA SCIENCE (ICOPS), 2016,
  • [6] 2D sections of porosity and water saturation from integrated resistivity and seismic surveys
    Mota, R.
    Monteiro Santos, F. A.
    NEAR SURFACE GEOPHYSICS, 2010, 8 (06) : 575 - 584
  • [7] The Seismic Analyzer: Interpreting and Illustrating 2D Seismic Data
    Patel, Daniel
    Giertsen, Christopher
    Thurmond, John
    Gjelberg, John
    Groeller, M. Eduard
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2008, 14 (06) : 1571 - 1578
  • [8] Innovative Use of Orthogonal 2D Seismic Surveys in Foundation Design
    Parkhill, Trent
    Covill, Troy
    Lingwall, Bret N.
    GEO-CONGRESS 2022: GEOPHYSICAL AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND SOIL DYNAMICS, 2022, 334 : 12 - 26
  • [9] Application of curvelet denoising to 2D and 3D seismic data - Practical considerations
    Gorszczyk, Andrzej
    Adamczyk, Anna
    Malinowski, Michal
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 105 : 78 - 94
  • [10] Rapid inversion of data from 2D resistivity surveys with electrode displacements
    Loke, M. H.
    Wilkinson, P. B.
    Chambers, J. E.
    Meldrum, P. I.
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2018, 66 (03) : 579 - 594