Comparison of anterior and posterior vertebral column resection versus anterior release with posterior internal distraction for severe and rigid scoliosis

被引:17
|
作者
Ren, Chunpeng [1 ]
Liu, Limin [1 ]
Song, Yueming [1 ]
Zhou, Chunguang [1 ]
Liu, Hao [1 ]
Li, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
关键词
Severe and rigid scoliosis; Vertebral column resection; Anterior release; Internal distraction; SEVERE SPINAL DEFORMITIES; HALO-GRAVITY TRACTION; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INSTRUMENTATION; OSTEOTOMY; EFFICACY; FUSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-014-3270-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to compare efficacy, safety, and cost between staged vertebral column resection (VCR) and anterior release with internal distraction in treating severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis. We examined the records of 43 patients with severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis treated in our hospital. Group A included 26 patients who underwent anterior VCR followed by posterior vertebral column resection and instrumentation from July 2007 to October 2009. Group B included 17 patients who underwent anterior release with temporary posterior internal distraction, followed by posterior fusion and instrumentation from November 2009 to June 2011. The average preoperative main curve for group A was 101.3A degrees (range 90A degrees-130A degrees) and for group B was 104.8A degrees (range 90A degrees-136A degrees). Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. A t test demonstrated that the differences between the groups in preoperative and postoperative coronal and sagittal imbalance, thoracic kyphosis correction, and lumbar lordosis were not statistically significant. Patients in group B showed better postoperative (P = 0.031) and final (P = 0.030) main thoracic curve correction (76.8 and 75.6 %, respectively) than patients in group A (68.3 and 67.7 %, respectively). Patients in group B had better thoracolumbar or lumbar curve correction (85.8 %) than those in group A (76.8 %; P = 0.048). The differences in blood loss and operation time were not statistically significant (P = 0.094 and P = 0.060, respectively). Hospital stay was longer (P = 0.001) and patient cost was higher (P < 0.001) for patients in group B. One patient in group A required ventilator support for 12 h after anterior surgery. One transient dyspnea occurred in group B. No neurologic deficits occurred in either group. Anterior release with posterior internal distraction produces better corrective effects than anterior and posterior VCR, though hospital stay and costs are greater.
引用
收藏
页码:1237 / 1243
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of anterior and posterior vertebral column resection versus anterior release with posterior internal distraction for severe and rigid scoliosis
    Chunpeng Ren
    Limin Liu
    Yueming Song
    Chunguang Zhou
    Hao Liu
    Tao Li
    European Spine Journal, 2014, 23 : 1237 - 1243
  • [2] Comparison of anterior and posterior vertebral column resection versus anterior and posterior spinal fusion for severe and rigid scoliosis
    Zhou, Chunguang
    Liu, Limin
    Song, Yueming
    Feng, Ganjun
    Yang, Xi
    Wang, Lei
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (06): : 948 - 953
  • [3] Anterior and posterior vertebral column resection for severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis
    Chunguang Zhou
    Limin Liu
    Yueming Song
    Hao Liu
    Tao Li
    Quan Gong
    Jiancheng Zeng
    Qingquan Kong
    European Spine Journal, 2011, 20 : 1728 - 1734
  • [4] Anterior and posterior vertebral column resection for severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis
    Zhou, Chunguang
    Liu, Limin
    Song, Yueming
    Liu, Hao
    Li, Tao
    Gong, Quan
    Zeng, Jiancheng
    Kong, Qingquan
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (10) : 1728 - 1734
  • [5] Anterior Release Internal Distraction and Posterior Spinal Fusion for Severe and Rigid Scoliosis
    Zhou, Chunguang
    Liu, Limin
    Song, Yueming
    Liu, Hao
    Li, Tao
    Gong, Quan
    Zeng, Jiancheng
    Kong, Qingquan
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (22) : E1411 - E1417
  • [6] Posterior vertebral column resection for severe rigid scoliosis
    Suk, SI
    Chung, ER
    Kim, JH
    Kim, SS
    Lee, JS
    Choi, WK
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (14) : 1682 - 1687
  • [7] A novel posterior multiple screws distraction reducer system versus anterior release, posterior internal distraction, and subsequent spinal fusion for severe scoliosis
    Ganjun Feng
    Yong Huang
    Leizhen Huang
    Yongliang Wang
    Juehan Wang
    Chunguang Zhou
    Lei Wang
    Zhongjie Zhou
    Xi Yang
    Limin Liu
    Yueming Song
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22
  • [8] A novel posterior multiple screws distraction reducer system versus anterior release, posterior internal distraction, and subsequent spinal fusion for severe scoliosis
    Feng, Ganjun
    Huang, Yong
    Huang, Leizhen
    Wang, Yongliang
    Wang, Juehan
    Zhou, Chunguang
    Wang, Lei
    Zhou, Zhongjie
    Yang, Xi
    Liu, Limin
    Song, Yueming
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [9] Posterior vertebral column resection for severe rigid scoliosis - Points of view
    Sengupta, DK
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (14) : E387 - E387
  • [10] Anterior release posterior internal distraction and subsequent posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of severe kyphoscoliosis
    Zhou, Chunguang
    Liu, Limin
    Song, Yueming
    Liu, Hao
    Zeng, Jiancheng
    Yang, Xi
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (07) : 1560 - 1567