AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF PATENT HOLDUP

被引:33
作者
Galetovic, Alexander [1 ]
Haber, Stephen [2 ]
Levine, Ross [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Los Andes, Santiago, Chile
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
ROYALTY STACKING; TROLLS; FRAND; COST;
D O I
10.1093/joclec/nhv024
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A large theoretical literature asserts that standard-essential patents (SEPs) allow their owners to "hold up" innovation by charging fees that exceed their incremental contribution to a final product. We evaluate two central, interrelated predictions of this SEP holdup hypothesis: (1) SEP-reliant industries should experience more stagnant quality-adjusted prices than non-SEP-reliant industries; and (2) court decisions that reduce the excessive power of SEP holders should accelerate innovation in SEP-reliant industries. We find no empirical support for either prediction. Indeed, SEP-reliant industries have the fastest quality-adjusted price declines in the U.S. economy.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 578
页数:30
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Balganesh S, 2008, HARVARD J LAW PUBL P, V31, P593
[2]  
Barnett Jonathan M., 2014, 15001 STANF U HOOV I
[3]  
Beckerman-Rodau Andrew, 2007, J PATENT TRADEMARK O, V89, P631
[4]  
Bresnahan T.F., 1989, HDB IND ORG, V2
[5]  
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 2014, PRIC IND PCE SOURC D
[6]  
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 2014, NAT INC PROD ACC HDB
[7]  
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 2013, HDB METH
[8]  
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 2008, BLS MEAS PRIC CHANG
[9]  
Diessel BH, 2007, MICH LAW REV, V106, P305
[10]  
Egan Edward J., 2015, 7 U CAL BERK TUSH CT