Application of the Cereal Unit in a new allocation procedure for agricultural life cycle assessments

被引:65
|
作者
Brankatschk, Gerhard [1 ]
Finkbeiner, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Dept Environm Technol, Chair Sustainable Engn, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Life Cycle Assessment; Agriculture; Co-product; Allocation; Cereal Unit; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; PRODUCTION SYSTEM; HYDROLYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The results of life cycle assessments (LCA) can be significantly affected by the choice of allocation procedure because different allocation approaches lead to a wide range of results. Agricultural systems are particularly sensitive due to their co-products being used in various sectors and accounted for at several allocation steps. If the allocation procedures for different products from the same agricultural system are not aligned to one another, methodological inconsistencies might occur. Parts of the environmental burden might be either unaccounted or doubly accounted for. As a consequence, the overall environmental burden of the agricultural system is not properly assessed. The Cereal Unit (CU) has been used as a common denominator in German agricultural statistics for decades and is mainly based on the nutritional value for livestock. Products and co-products not intended for livestock feeds are also covered. More than 200 CU conversion factors are provided for vegetable and animal products and co-products occurring during their processing. To calculate the CU, the specifically aggregated metabolizable energy content is calculated for each feed material and normalized using barley as a reference (1 kg barley = 12.56 MJ specifically aggregated metabolizable energy). The CU approach can be applied to other regions without prohibitive efforts. In this paper, we derive an allocation approach that is based on the CU as an existing unit for agricultural products. The new CU allocation approach is tested and compared to established allocation approaches for wheat, barley, soybean, rapeseed, sugar beet and sunflower. The CU allocation generates results between the approaches of mass, energy and economic allocations. For instance, the allocation shares between wheat grain and wheat straw are as follows: mass allocation 56% (grains)144% (straw), energy allocation 55%/45%, economic allocation 77%/23% and CU allocation 75%/25%. We demonstrate that the CU is an appropriate unit for the description of agricultural products and can serve as the basis for an agriculture-specific allocation approach in LCA. CU allocation may help to address agricultural allocation problems and might lead to more robust LCA results for products and services originating from raw agricultural materials. We recommend further testing and future application of this new allocation approach. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 79
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitive parameters in local agricultural life cycle assessments: the illustrative case of cereal production in Wallonia, Belgium
    Florence Van Stappen
    Michaël Mathot
    Astrid Loriers
    Alice Delcour
    Didier Stilmant
    Viviane Planchon
    Bernard Bodson
    Angélique Léonard
    Jean-Pierre Goffart
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 225 - 250
  • [2] Sensitive parameters in local agricultural life cycle assessments: the illustrative case of cereal production in Wallonia, Belgium
    Van Stappen, Florence
    Mathot, Michael
    Loriers, Astrid
    Delcour, Alice
    Stilmant, Didier
    Planchon, Viviane
    Bodson, Bernard
    Leonard, Angelique
    Goffart, Jean-Pierre
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (02): : 225 - 250
  • [3] Allocation and system boundary in life cycle assessments of cities
    Alberti, Jaume
    Roca, Merce
    Brodhag, Christian
    Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere
    HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 83 : 41 - 54
  • [4] Application of Life Cycle Assessments in Waste Management
    Mazhandu, Zvanaka S.
    Muzenda, Edison
    Belaid, Mohamed
    Nhubu, Trust
    Muzenda, Edison
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 9TH INTERNATIONAL RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY CONFERENCE (IRSEC), 2021, : 569 - 577
  • [5] The challenges of including impacts on biodiversity in agricultural life cycle assessments
    Gabel, Vanessa M.
    Meier, Matthias S.
    Koepke, Ulrich
    Stolze, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 181 : 249 - 260
  • [6] Impacts of the Allocation Assumption in Life-Cycle Assessments of Wood-Based Panels
    Taylor, Adam M.
    Bergman, Richard D.
    Puettmann, Maureen E.
    Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2017, 67 (5-6) : 390 - 396
  • [7] The need for co-product allocation in the life cycle assessment of agricultural systems—is “biophysical” allocation progress?
    Stephen G. Mackenzie
    Ilkka Leinonen
    Ilias Kyriazakis
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 128 - 137
  • [8] Accounting for biodiversity in life cycle impact assessments of forestry and agricultural systems—the BioImpact metric
    Perpetua A. M. Turner
    Fabiano A. Ximenes
    Trent D. Penman
    Bradley S. Law
    Cathleen M. Waters
    Timothy Grant
    Matthew Mo
    Philippa M. Brock
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2019, 24 : 1985 - 2007
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of biochar for sustainable agricultural application: A review
    Li, Jiao
    Sun, Wenhui
    Lichtfouse, Eric
    Maurer, Claudia
    Liu, Hongbo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 951
  • [10] The need for co-product allocation in the life cycle assessment of agricultural systems-is "biophysical" allocation progress?
    Mackenzie, Stephen G.
    Leinonen, Ilkka
    Kyriazakis, Ilias
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (02): : 128 - 137