Accuracy evaluation of the latest BDGIM for BDS-3 satellites

被引:16
|
作者
Zhu, Yongxing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tan, Shusen [4 ]
Zhang, Qinghua [5 ]
Ren, Xia [2 ,3 ]
Jia, Xiaolin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Informat Engn Univ, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Res Inst Surveying & Mapping, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] State Key Lab Geoinformat Engn, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Satellite Nav Ctr, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
[5] Army Engn Univ, Nanjing 210007, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
BDS-3; BDGIM; NeQuickG; GPS; Ionospheric delay; Accuracy analysis; IONOSPHERIC TEC; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2019.06.021
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
A novel model of the BeiDou Global Ionospheric delay correction Model (BDGIM) is used as the global broadcasting ionospheric correction model for the third generation of BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS-3). It has been successfully implemented on five BDS-3 test satellites. The accuracy of this novel BDGIM model were evaluated using the final global ionosphere maps (GIM) products provided by the International Global Navigation Satellite System Service (IGS). Comparing with the IGS GIM final product, the root mean square (RMS) of the global correction accuracy of BDGIM was 3.57 total electron content unit (TECu) with a correction percentage of 77.2%. The average RMS at different latitudes was 3.11 TECu, with Percent of 75.2%. The mean RMS values of regions with lattilute larger than 52.5S and 62.5N were less than that of NeQuickG. Considering the distribution of the tracking stations using for calculating BDGIM coefficients, the RMS values in different regions were 3.09 TECu (Percent = 80.3%) and 3.21 TECu (Percent = 79.4%), respectively. The BDGIM coefficients was updated every two hours, comparing with NeQuickG model, the BDGIM better reflected the real changes of ionosphere. Considering that the accuracy of the non-broadcasted coefficients declines with broadcasting duration, the correction accuracy with nine broadcasted coefficients included in BDGIM was analyzed. RMS and Percent were 4.10 TECu and 72.8%, declining by about 0.53 TECu and 4.4% (maximum to 9.7%), respectively. (C) 2019 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1217 / 1224
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimation of the DCB for the BDS-3 new signals based on BDGIM constraints
    Zhu, Yongxing
    Tan, Shusen
    Feng, Laiping
    Cui, Xianqiang
    Zhang, Qinghua
    Jia, Xiaolin
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2020, 66 (06) : 1405 - 1414
  • [2] Precise Orbit Determination and Accuracy Analysis for BDS-3 Satellites Using SLR Observations
    An, Zicong
    Shao, Kai
    Gu, Defeng
    Wei, Chunbo
    Xu, Zheyu
    Tong, Lisheng
    Zhu, Jubo
    Wang, Jian
    Liu, Daoping
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [3] Accuracy evaluation of wide-area differential service for BDS-3
    Tian Q.
    Cao Y.
    Hu X.
    Tang C.
    Guo R.
    Yang Y.
    Beijing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021, 47 (05): : 967 - 976
  • [4] Orbit Accuracy for BDS-3 Satellites During the Earth Eclipsing Period in Basic Navigation Mode
    Li X.
    Liu X.
    Zu A.
    Xu J.
    Liu S.
    Xin J.
    Guo J.
    Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2020, 45 (06): : 854 - 861
  • [5] Spaceborne atomic clock performance review of BDS-3 MEO satellites
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Yupu
    Yu, Chao
    Xu, Fen
    Dou, Xiaojing
    MEASUREMENT, 2021, 175
  • [6] Performance evaluation of BDS-3 ionospheric delay correction models (BDSK and BDGIM): First year for full operational capability of global service
    Zhang, Qiang
    Liu, Xuanzuo
    Liu, Zhuoya
    Hu, Zhigang
    Zhao, Qile
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2022, 70 (03) : 687 - 698
  • [7] Solar Radiation Pressure Modeling and Validation for BDS-3 MEO Satellites
    Chen, Qiuli
    Zhang, Xu
    Wang, Chen
    Wang, Haihong
    Ren, Chen
    Ma, Fujian
    Zhao, Xinglong
    REMOTE SENSING, 2025, 17 (06)
  • [8] Comparison and analysis of two orbit determination methods for BDS-3 satellites
    Yang Y.
    Yang Y.
    Hu X.
    Tang C.
    Zhao L.
    Xu J.
    Cehui Xuebao/Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2019, 48 (07): : 831 - 839
  • [9] Analysis and correction of BDS-3 MEO satellites pseudorange multipath error
    Liu J.
    Cao Y.
    Hu X.
    Guofang Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2021, 43 (04): : 1 - 8
  • [10] Modeling non-conservative forces for BDS-3 MEO satellites
    Ruan R.
    Jia X.
    Feng L.
    Wang L.
    Zhang F.
    Cehui Xuebao/Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2022, 51 (09): : 1862 - 1869