Analysis of the hybrid copper oxide-copper sulfate cycle for the thermochemical splitting of water for hydrogen production

被引:7
|
作者
Gonzales, Ross B. [2 ]
Law, Victor J. [1 ]
Prindle, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Chem & Biomol Engn Dept, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Chem Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Thermochemical cycle; Hydrogen production; Hybrid copper oxide-copper sulfate; Process design; WESTINGHOUSE SULFUR CYCLE; DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.12.026
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The hybrid copper oxide-copper sulfate water-splitting thermochemical cycle involves two principal steps: (1) hydrogen production from the electrolysis of water, SO2(g) and CuO(s) at room temperature and (2) the thermal decomposition of the CuSO4 product to form oxygen and SO2, which is recycled to the first step. A four-reaction version of the cycle (known in the literature as Cycle H-5) was used as the basis of the present work. For several of the four reactions, a rotating batch reactor sequence is proposed in order to overcome equilibrium limitations. Pinch technology was used to optimize heat integration. Sensitivity analyses revealed it to be economically more attractive to use a 10 degrees C approach to minimize heat loss (rather than 20 degrees C). Using standard Aspen Plus features and the Peng-Robinson equation of state for separations involving oxygen and sulfur oxides, a proposed flowsheet for the cycle was generated to yield "Level 3" results. A cost analysis of the designed plant (producing 100 million kmol/yr hydrogen) indicates a total major equipment cost of approximately $45 million. This translates to a turnkey plant price (excluding the cost of the high-temperature heat source or electrolyzer internals) of approximately $360 million. Based on a $2.50/kg selling price for hydrogen, gross annual revenue could be on the order of $500 million, resulting in a reasonable payback period when all capital and operating costs are considered. Previous efficiency estimates using Level 1 and Level 2 methods gave the process efficiency in the neighborhood of 47-48%. The Level 3 efficiency computation was 24-25% depending on the approach temperature used for recuperation. If the low quality heat rejected by the process can be recovered and used elsewhere, the Level 3 analysis could be as high as 51-53%. (C) 2008 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4179 / 4188
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE COPPER CHLORINE THERMOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF WATER SPLITTING FOR HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION
    BARBOOTI, MM
    ALANI, RR
    THERMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1984, 78 (1-3) : 275 - 284
  • [2] Solar hydrogen production via thermochemical magnesium oxide - Magnesium sulfate water splitting cycle
    Bhosale, Rahul R.
    FUEL, 2020, 275
  • [3] Solar hydrogen production via thermochemical iron oxide-iron sulfate water splitting cycle
    Bhosale, Rahul R.
    Kumar, Anand
    van den Broeke, Leo J. P.
    Gharbia, Shand
    Dardor, Dareen
    Jilani, Mehak
    Folady, Jamila
    Al-Fakih, Mashail Shaif
    Tarsad, Mahsa Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (04) : 1639 - 1650
  • [4] Hydrogen production via solar driven thermochemical cerium oxide - cerium sulfate water splitting cycle
    Bhosale, Rahul R.
    AlMomani, Fares
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (17) : 10381 - 10390
  • [5] Coupling of copper-chloride hybrid thermochemical water splitting cycle with a desalination plant for hydrogen production from nuclear energy
    Orhan, Mehmet F.
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Naterer, Greg F.
    Rosen, Marc A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (04) : 1560 - 1574
  • [6] A NEW SOLAR METAL SULFATE - AMMONIA BASED THERMOCHEMICAL WATER SPLITTING CYCLE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN
    T-Raissi, Ali
    Huang, Cunping
    Mao, Liqun
    Muradov, Nazim
    MATERIALS ISSUES IN A HYDROGEN ECONOMY, 2009, : 15 - 45
  • [7] Solar hydrogen production via erbium oxide based thermochemical water splitting cycle
    Bhosale, Rahul R.
    Sutar, Parag
    Kumar, Anand
    AlMomani, Fares
    Ali, Moustafa Hussein
    Ghosh, Ujjal
    AlMuhtaseb, Shaheen
    Khraisheh, Majeda
    JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2016, 8 (03)
  • [8] Solar thermochemical plant analysis for hydrogen production with the copper-chlorine cycle
    Ghandehariun, S.
    Naterer, G. F.
    Dincer, I.
    Rosen, M. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (16) : 8511 - 8520
  • [9] Progress in thermochemical hydrogen production with the copper-chlorine cycle
    Naterer, G. F.
    Suppiah, S.
    Stolberg, L.
    Lewis, M.
    Wang, Z.
    Rosen, M. A.
    Dincer, I.
    Gabriel, K.
    Odukoya, A.
    Secnik, E.
    Easton, E. B.
    Papangelakis, V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (19) : 6283 - 6295
  • [10] An exergy-cost-energy-mass analysis of a hybrid copper-chlorine thermochemical cycle for hydrogen production
    Orhan, Mehmet F.
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Rosen, Marc A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (10) : 4831 - 4838