A framework for modelling tactical decision-making in autonomous systems

被引:15
|
作者
Evertsz, Rick [1 ]
Thangarajah, John [1 ]
Yadav, Nitin [1 ]
Ly, Thanh [2 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Comp Sci & IT, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Def Sci & Technol Org, Joint & Operat Anal Div, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Tactics modelling; Behaviour modelling; Multi-agent systems; AGENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2015.08.046
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
There is an increasing need for autonomous systems that exhibit effective decision-making in unpredictable environments. However, the design of autonomous decision-making systems presents considerable challenges, particularly when they have to achieve their goals within a dynamic context. Tactics designed to handle unexpected environmental change, or attack by an adversary, must balance the need for reactivity with that of remaining focused on the system's overall goal. The lack of a design methodology and supporting tools for representing tactics makes them difficult to understand, maintain and reuse. This is a significant problem in the design of tactical decision-making systems. We describe a methodology and accompanying tool, TDF (Tactics Development Framework), based on the BDI (Beliefs, Desires, Intentions) paradigm. TDF supports structural modelling of missions, goals, scenarios, input/output, messaging and procedures, and generates skeleton code that reflects the overall design. TDF has been evaluated through comparison with UML, indicating that it provides significant benefits to those building autonomous, tactical decision-making systems. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 238
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modelling human emotions for tactical decision-making games
    Visschedijk, Gillian C.
    Lazonder, Ard W.
    van der Hulst, Anja
    Vink, Nathalie
    Leemkuil, Henny
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 44 (02) : 197 - 207
  • [2] Autonomous Surveillance Robots A Decision-Making Framework for Networked Multiagent Systems
    Witwicki, Stefan
    Carlos Castillo, Jose
    Messias, Joao
    Capitan, Jesus
    Melo, Francisco S.
    Lima, Pedro U.
    Veloso, Manuela
    IEEE ROBOTICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE, 2017, 24 (03) : 52 - 64
  • [3] Autonomous decision-making for dogfights based on a tactical pursuit point approach
    Xu, Jiwen
    Zhang, Jing
    Yang, Lingyu
    Liu, Chang
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 129
  • [4] Tactical Decision-Making in Autonomous Driving by Reinforcement Learning with Uncertainty Estimation
    Hoel, Carl-Johan
    Wolff, Krister
    Laine, Leo
    2020 IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM (IV), 2020, : 1563 - 1569
  • [5] A NEW DECISION-MAKING SYSTEMS FRAMEWORK
    Molloy, Ella-Mae
    Siemieniuch, Carys
    Sinclair, Murray
    CONTEMPORARY ERGONOMICS 2008, 2008, : 55 - +
  • [6] Online Decision-Making for Scalable Autonomous Systems
    Wray, Kyle Hollins
    Witwicki, Stefan J.
    Zilberstein, Shlomo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SIXTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2017, : 4768 - 4774
  • [7] Analysing the Safety of Decision-Making in Autonomous Systems
    Osborne, Matt
    Hawkins, Richard
    McDermid, John
    COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY, SAFECOMP 2022, 2022, 13414 : 3 - 16
  • [8] A hierarchical perception decision-making framework for autonomous driving
    Zhang E.
    Huang J.
    Gao Y.
    Liu Y.
    Deng Y.
    Cyber-Physical Systems, 2022, 8 (03) : 192 - 209
  • [9] Ethics of Autonomous Collective Decision-Making: The Caesar Framework
    Mirgita Frasheri
    Vaclav Struhar
    Alessandro Vittorio Papadopoulos
    Aida Causevic
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2022, 28
  • [10] Ethics of Autonomous Collective Decision-Making: The Caesar Framework
    Frasheri, Mirgita
    Struhar, Vaclav
    Papadopoulos, Alessandro Vittorio
    Causevic, Aida
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2022, 28 (06)