Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of multidimensional quality of life scale - Cancer version 2 in patients with cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Pinar, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Coll Nursing, Dept Med Nursing, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
cancer patients; MQOLS-CA2; quality of life; SF-36;
D O I
10.1097/00002820-200405000-00012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study examined the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale - Cancer Version 2 (MQOLS-CA2) in 72 people with cancer. The results indicated that the MQOLS-CA2 has good construct validity. Factor analysis confirmed the presence of 5 factors in the MQOLS-CA2: psychological well-being, physical well-being, nutrition, symptom distress, and interpersonal well-being. The correlation between the global scores of the MQOLS-CA2 and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey was significant (r = 0.78, P = .0001), supporting the criterion validity of the MQOLS-CA2. Results of the test-retest method showed that stability coefficients for the 5 subscales of the MQOLS-CA2 ranged from 0.56 (symptom distress) to 0.91 (general physical well-being). Cronbach alpha coefficients surpassed the 0.70 criterion for all subscales, indicating good internal consistency. The acceptability rate was excellent at 96% completed questionnaires. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the Turkish version of the MQOLS-CA2 is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in cancer research.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 257
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability and Validity of Turkish Version of the Caregiver Quality of Life Index Cancer Scale
    Yakar, Hatice Karabuga
    Pinar, Rukiye
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2013, 14 (07) : 4415 - 4419
  • [2] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Quality of Life Index [QLI] (Cancer version)
    Can, Gulbeyaz
    Durna, Zehra
    Aydiner, Adnan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2010, 14 (04) : 316 - 321
  • [3] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Professional Quality of Life Scale
    Yesil, Asli
    Ergun, Uemit
    Amasyali, Cumhur
    Er, Fatih
    Olgun, Nesliguel Nihal
    Aker, A. Tamer
    NOROPSIKIYATRI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2010, 47 (02): : 111 - 117
  • [4] Turkish version of the cancer stigma scale: validity and reliability study
    Paltun, Birsen
    Bolukbas, Nurgul
    PSYCHOLOGY HEALTH & MEDICINE, 2021, 26 : 37 - 48
  • [5] Validity and Reliability of a Turkish Version of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale
    Dedeli, Ozden
    Fadiloglu, Cicek
    Bor, Serhat
    JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2009, 36 (05) : 532 - 538
  • [6] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Needs Assessment Scale of Patients with Cancer
    Erci, Behice
    Aslan, Hakime
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2022, 20 (05) : 671 - 677
  • [7] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale in Cancer Patients
    Yildirim, Yasemin
    Tokem, Yasemin
    Bozkurt, Nilufer
    Fadiloglu, Cicek
    Uyar, Meltem
    Uslu, Ruchan
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2011, 12 (12) : 3389 - 3396
  • [8] Reliability and Validity of a Japanese Version of the Quality of Life Index in Cancer Patients
    Mizuno, Michiyo
    Nemoto, Noriko
    Sasahara, Tomoyo
    Yamashita, Michiyo
    CANCER NURSING, 2016, 39 : S105 - S105
  • [9] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Quality of Life Index for patients with cancer
    Mizuno, Michiyo
    Munezawa, Noriko
    Yamashita, Michiyo
    Sasahara, Tomoyo
    Mayers, Thomas
    Park, Chang
    Ferrans, Carol Estwing
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2020, 43 (02) : 176 - 185
  • [10] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer
    Senkal, Hilmi Alper
    Hayran, Mutlu
    Karakaya, Ebru
    Yueh, Bevan
    Weymuller, Ernest A., Jr.
    Hosal, A. Sefik
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 33 (04) : 417 - 426