Collective social enterprises for social innovation: Understanding the potential and limitations of cross-sector partnerships in the field of work integration

被引:16
|
作者
Rey-Garcia, Marta [1 ]
Calvo, Nuria [1 ]
Mato-Santiso, Vanessa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ A Coruna, Sch Econ & Business, La Coruna, Spain
关键词
Social innovation; Resource-based view; Work integration; Dynamic capabilities; Cross-sector partnerships; Collective social enterprises; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; STRATEGY; EUROPE; VIEW;
D O I
10.1108/MD-01-2017-0091
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose Cross-sector partnerships (CSPs) are one type of collective social enterprise that has gained importance as a vehicle for social innovation (SI). The purpose of this paper is to understand the sources of the competitive advantage of CSPs as a strategic option for SI. Design/methodology/approach The authors propose a conceptual framework that integrates two interrelated dimensions of CSP competitiveness - resources and coordination - and their corresponding indicators. Then, the authors apply it to an in-depth case study through qualitative enquiry of a large CSP in the field of work integration during its formation and implementation stages (2012-2016). The authors employ a case study design with process tracing methods for increased validity, analyzing structured data from multiple sources (documentary, in-depth interviews with field experts and key decision-makers in coordinating partner organizations, direct observations) through narrative and visual mapping strategies. Findings Results illustrate the dynamic interaction between the key dimensions and factors that shape the potential and limitations of CSPs for SI and evidence three types of tensions which management influences partnership outcomes: hierarchical/horizontal commitment; competition/collaboration; and managerial efficiency/social transformation. Originality/value This research highlights the pivotal role of product development for the organizing of SI in a CSP context and proposes a conceptual framework that paves the way for future research on the sources of competitive advantage of CSPs, facilitating the assessment of their performance in terms of socially innovative outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1415 / 1440
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Navigating Cross-Sector Partnerships: Innovative Strategies and Challenges for Work Integration Social Enterprises in France
    Trasciani, Giorgia
    Petrella, Francesca
    Richez-Battesti, Nadine
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2024,
  • [2] Cross-Sector Partnerships: Factors Supporting Social Innovation by Nonprofits
    Shier, Micheal L.
    Handy, Femida
    HUMAN SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP & GOVERNANCE, 2016, 40 (03) : 253 - 266
  • [3] Trickle Effects of Cross-Sector Social Partnerships
    Ans Kolk
    Willemijn van Dolen
    Marlene Vock
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 94 : 123 - 137
  • [4] Trickle Effects of Cross-Sector Social Partnerships
    Kolk, Ans
    van Dolen, Willemijn
    Vock, Marlene
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 94 : 123 - 137
  • [5] (Re)Forming Strategic Cross-Sector Partnerships Relational Processes of Social Innovation
    Le Ber, Marlene J.
    Branzei, Oana
    BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2010, 49 (01) : 140 - 172
  • [6] Network portfolio diversity and social innovation: An egocentric approach to cross-sector partnerships
    Fu, Jiawei Sophia
    SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2024, 78 : 238 - 252
  • [7] Open strategy as a catalyst for innovation: Evidence from cross-sector social partnerships
    Pittz, Thomas G.
    Adler, Terry R.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 160
  • [8] Exploring absorptive capacity in cross-sector social partnerships
    Pittz, Thomas G.
    Intindola, Melissa
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2015, 53 (06) : 1170 - 1183
  • [9] Cross-Sector Partnerships: City Regeneration and Social Justice
    Nelarine Cornelius
    James Wallace
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 94 : 71 - 84
  • [10] The Gatekeeping Function of Trust in Cross-sector Social Partnerships
    Venn, Ronald
    Berg, Nicola
    BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW, 2014, 119 (03) : 385 - 416