Process quality indicators in family medicine: results of an international comparison

被引:26
|
作者
Pavlic, Danica Rotar [1 ]
Sever, Maja [2 ]
Klemenc-Ketis, Zalika [1 ,3 ]
Svab, Igor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Dept Family Med, Fac Med, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Stat Off Republ Slovenia, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[3] Univ Maribor, Fac Med, Dept Family Med, SLO-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
关键词
Family physician; Process quality; Country; Comparison; PRIMARY-CARE; GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; PHYSICIANS; NETHERLANDS; IMPROVEMENT; MANAGEMENT; ENGLAND; COSTS; RATES;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-015-0386-7
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of our study was to describe variability in process quality in family medicine among 31 European countries plus Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. The quality of family medicine was measured in terms of continuity, coordination, community orientation, and comprehensiveness of care. Methods: The QUALICOPC study (Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe) was carried out among family physicians in 31 European countries (the EU 27 except for France, plus Macedonia, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, and Turkey) and three non-European countries (Australia, Canada, and New Zealand). We used random sampling when national registers of practitioners were available. Regional registers or lists of facilities were used for some countries. A standardized questionnaire was distributed to the physicians, resulting in a sample of 6734 participants. Data collection took place between October 2011 and December 2013. Based on completed questionnaires, a three-dimensional framework was established to measure continuity, coordination, community orientation, and comprehensiveness of care. Multilevel linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the variation of quality attributable to the family physician level and the country level. Results: None of the 34 countries in this study consistently scored the best or worst in all categories. Continuity of care was perceived by family physicians as the most important dimension of quality. Some components of comprehensiveness of care, including medical technical procedures, preventive care and health care promotion, varied substantially between countries. Coordination of care was identified as the weakest part of quality. We found that physician-level characteristics contributed to the majority of variation. Conclusions: A comparison of process quality indicators in family medicine revealed similarities and differences within and between countries. The researchers found that the major proportion of variation can be explained by physicians' characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Process quality indicators in family medicine: results of an international comparison
    Danica Rotar Pavlič
    Maja Sever
    Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš
    Igor Švab
    BMC Family Practice, 16
  • [2] Comparison of Research Trends in Korean and International Family Medicine in Journals of Family Medicine
    Jeon, Jin-Kyung
    Lee, Jungun
    Lee, Dong Ryul
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2014, 35 (06): : 265 - 275
  • [3] IMPLEMENTING QUALITY INDICATORS FOR DIABETES AND HYPERTENSION IN FAMILY MEDICINE IN SLOVENIA
    Klemenc-Ketis, Zalika
    Svab, Igor
    Poplas Susic, Antonija
    ZDRAVSTVENO VARSTVO, 2017, 56 (04): : 211 - 219
  • [4] Quality indicators in emergency medicine
    Celemente Rodriguez, Carlos
    Aranda Cardenas, Dolors
    Puiggali Ballart, Margarita
    Puente Palacios, Isabel
    EMERGENCIAS, 2011, 23 (06): : 497 - 498
  • [5] Quality Indicators in Transfusion Medicine
    Alexander, S.
    Radhakrishnan, K.
    Panicker, V. K.
    TRANSFUSION, 2014, 54 : 260A - 260A
  • [6] The quality of energy intensity indicators for international comparison in the iron and steel industry
    Farla, JCM
    Blok, K
    ENERGY POLICY, 2001, 29 (07) : 523 - 543
  • [7] Development of Cardiovascular Quality Indicators for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from an International Expert Panel Using a Novel Online Process
    Barber, Claire E. H.
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Alvarez, Nanette
    Mancini, G. B. John
    Lacaille, Diane
    Keeling, Stephanie
    Avina-Zubieta, J. Antonio
    Khodyakov, Dmitry
    Barnabe, Cheryl
    Faris, Peter
    Smith, Alexa
    Noormohamed, Raheem
    Hazlewood, Glen
    Martin, Liam O.
    Esdaile, John M.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2015, 42 (09) : 1548 - 1555
  • [8] Nigerian results from the International Family Quality of Life project
    Ajuwon, P.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2008, 52 : 718 - 718
  • [9] Family quality of life: Canadian results from an international study
    Brown, I
    Anand, S
    Isaacs, B
    Baum, N
    Fung, WLA
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSICAL DISABILITIES, 2003, 15 (03) : 207 - 230
  • [10] Japanese and Indian results for the International Family Quality of Life Project
    Takahashi, R.
    Shimada, H.
    Sato, M.
    Saraswathi, D. T.
    Manuel, T.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2008, 52 : 712 - 712