Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2014 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: Comparison With Multiphasic Multidetector Computed Tomography

被引:58
|
作者
Joo, Ijin [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Dong Ho [1 ,2 ]
Ahn, Su Joa [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Eun Sun [4 ]
Han, Joon Koo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
KOREA PRACTICE GUIDELINES; NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS; HEPATOBILIARY-PHASE; LESS-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO-2; CM; TRANSPLANT NETWORK; ORGAN PROCUREMENT; CRITERIA; CT; CLASSIFICATION; NODULES;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25406
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI) in comparison with multiphasic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Materials and Methods: Our Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent. We included 182 high-risk patients with 216 pathologically confirmed HCCs who underwent both Gd-EOB-MRI at 1.5 or 3T and multiphasic MDCT. Two independent radiologists assessed the presence or absence of major HCC features and assigned LI-RADS categories before and after considering ancillary features on both MRI and MDCT. Finally, sensitivities of LR-5/5v and frequencies of major HCC features were compared between MRI and MDCT using the McNemar test. Results: Sensitivities of LR-5/5v were not significantly different between MRI and MDCT (63.4% [137/216] vs. 64.4% [139/216], P = 0.831; 60.6% [131/216] vs. 60.6% [131/216], P = 0.868, for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively). Among major HCC features seen on consensus review, washout and capsule appearance were less frequently observed on MRI than on MDCT (69.0% [149/216] vs. 87.0% [188/216], P < 0.001 and 17.1% [37/216] vs. 31.5% [68/216], P < 0.001), while no significant differences were found for arterial hyperenhancement (88.9% [192/216] vs. 84.7% [183/216], P = 0.081). Ancillary features led to category changes in 18.1% (39/216) of nodules on MRI (all, LR-3 to LR-4), while no changes were seen on MDCT. Conclusion: Using LI-RADS, Gd-EOB-MRI showed comparable sensitivity to multiphasic MDCT for the diagnosis of HCCs, and ancillary features of MRI frequently led to the upgrade of nodules from LR-3 to LR-4.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 740
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LI-RADS v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Intraindividual comparison between gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Song, Ji Soo
    Choi, Eun Jung
    Hwang, Seung Bae
    Hwang, Hong Pil
    Choi, HyeMi
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 401 - 410
  • [2] LI-RADS v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Intraindividual comparison between gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Ji Soo Song
    Eun Jung Choi
    Seung Bae Hwang
    Hong Pil Hwang
    HyeMi Choi
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 401 - 410
  • [3] Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: A comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and multiphasic MDCT
    Baek, C. -K.
    Choi, J. -Y.
    Kim, K. -A.
    Park, M. -S.
    Lim, J. S.
    Chung, Y. E.
    Kim, M. -J.
    Kim, K. -W.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 67 (02) : 148 - 156
  • [4] Simplified liver imaging reporting and data system for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Lyu, Rong
    Hu, Wei-Juan
    Wang, Di
    Wang, Jiao
    Ye, Yu-Bing
    Jia, Ke-Feng
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 16 (06) : 2439 - 2448
  • [5] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: comparison between computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Sei Nakao
    Masahiro Tanabe
    Munemasa Okada
    Matakazu Furukawa
    Etsushi Iida
    Keisuke Miyoshi
    Naofumi Matsunaga
    Katsuyoshi Ito
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2019, 37 : 651 - 659
  • [6] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: comparison between computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Nakao, Sei
    Tanabe, Masahiro
    Okada, Munemasa
    Furukawa, Matakazu
    Iida, Etsushi
    Miyoshi, Keisuke
    Matsunaga, Naofumi
    Ito, Katsuyoshi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 37 (09) : 651 - 659
  • [7] Diagnostic accuracy of liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2014 for intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinomas in patients with chronic liver disease on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Lee, Sang Min
    Lee, Jeong Sub
    Park, Jin Young
    Han, Joon Koo
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (05) : 1330 - 1338
  • [8] Comparison of CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with liver imaging reporting and data system to assess liver tumors before resection
    Chen, Mo-Fan
    Ho, Ming-Chih
    Kao, Jia-Horng
    Hwang, Ruey-Ming
    Deng, Shyh-Bang
    Yen, Kuang-Chen
    Liang, Po-Chin
    Wu, Chih-Horng
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 123 (03) : 318 - 324
  • [9] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System on CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging
    Cha, Dong Ik
    Jang, Kyung Mi
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Kang, Tae Wook
    Song, Kyoung Doo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (10) : 4394 - 4405
  • [10] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System on CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging
    Dong Ik Cha
    Kyung Mi Jang
    Seong Hyun Kim
    Tae Wook Kang
    Kyoung Doo Song
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 4394 - 4405