Distributed end-to-end proportional delay differentiation in wireless LAN

被引:5
|
作者
Xue, Y [1 ]
Chen, K [1 ]
Nahrstedt, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Comp Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1109/ICC.2004.1313372
中图分类号
TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0809 ;
摘要
Providing service differentiation in wireless networks has attracted much attention in recent research. Existing studies so far have focused on the design of MAC layer protocols to achieve distributed priority scheduling. While these works have been shown to achieve certain differentiation (higher throughput or lower delay for higher priority packets) at MAC layer, they did not consider the problem of service differentiation from end-to-end perspective. Moreover, these approaches did not present a formalized service differentiation model that quantifies the degree of differentiation, which is critical for service class selection and provision. This paper addresses above problems by introducing a clear service differentiation model, proportional se ice differentiation, to the domain of wireless network which targets at providing proportional delay differentiation in wireless LAN. Due to the unique characteristic of distributed medium sharing, the scheduling algorithm employed in wireline networks can not be applied directly to the context of the wireless network. We argue that delay differentiation in wireless LAN can be only achieved through a joint packet scheduling at network layer and distributed coordination at MAC layer. Hereby, we present a distributed waiting time priority scheduling (DWTP) algorithm which is deployed on a cross-layer architecture. DWTP consists of two tiers: an intra-node predictive WTP scheduler at network layer and an inter-node priority-based distributed coordination at MAC layer. These two tiers coordinate via cross-layer priority mapping to achieve proportional delay differentiation. Simulation results show that the cross-layer DWTP algorithm can effectively achieve proportional delay differentiation in wireless LAN.
引用
收藏
页码:4367 / 4371
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] End-to-End Delay Guaranteed Proportional Fair Scheduling for Wireless Networks
    Jeon, Jae-Han
    Byun, Hee-Jung
    Lim, Jong-Tae
    IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, 2011, 15 (04) : 401 - 403
  • [2] End-to-end delay differentiation by prioritized multipath routing in wireless sensor networks
    Huang, Xiaoxia
    Fang, Yuguang
    MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2005, : 1277 - 1283
  • [3] End-to-end proportional loss differentiation in BS networks
    Gonzalez-Ortega, Miguel A.
    Lopez-Ardao, Jose C.
    Argibay-Losada, Pablo
    Suarez-Gonzalez, Andres
    Lopez-Garcia, Candido
    Fernandez-Veiga, Manuel
    Rodriguez-Rubio, Raul F.
    NETWORKING 2008: AD HOC AND SENSOR NETWORKS, WIRELESS NETWORKS, NEXT GENERATION INTERNET, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 4982 : 346 - 357
  • [4] End-to-End Delay in Wireless Random Networks
    Yu, Seung Min
    Kim, Seong-Lyun
    IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, 2010, 14 (02) : 109 - 111
  • [5] End-to-end differentiation of congestion and wireless losses
    Song, C
    Cosman, PC
    Voelker, GM
    MULTIMEDIA COMPUTING AND NETWORKING 2002, 2002, 4673 : 1 - 15
  • [6] End-to-end differentiation of congestion and wireless losses
    Cen, S
    Cosman, PC
    Voelker, GM
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 2003, 11 (05) : 703 - 717
  • [7] Adaptive per hop differentiation for end-to-end delay assurance in multihop wireless networks
    Li, Jian
    Li, Zhi
    Mohapatra, Prasant
    AD HOC NETWORKS, 2009, 7 (06) : 1169 - 1182
  • [8] An SDN-based true end-to-end TCP for wireless LAN
    Krishna Vijay Kumar Singh
    Mayank Pandey
    Wireless Networks, 2021, 27 : 1413 - 1430
  • [9] An SDN-based true end-to-end TCP for wireless LAN
    Singh, Krishna Vijay Kumar
    Pandey, Mayank
    WIRELESS NETWORKS, 2021, 27 (02) : 1413 - 1430
  • [10] End-to-End Delay Distribution in Wireless Heterogeneous Networks
    Mansouri, Wahida
    Zarai, Faouzi
    Mnif, Kais
    Obaidat, Mohammad S.
    Kamoun, Lotfi
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS (ICC), 2013, : 2969 - 2973