Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China

被引:369
作者
Lin, H. [1 ]
Zeng, S. X. [1 ]
Ma, H. Y. [1 ]
Qi, G. Y. [2 ]
Tam, Vivian W. Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Sch Management, Shanghai 200052, Peoples R China
[2] E China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Western Sydney, Sch Comp Engn & Math, Penrith, NSW 1797, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green innovation; Process innovation; Product innovation; Political capital; Stakeholders; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; FIRM PERFORMANCE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; ECO-INNOVATION; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; RESPONSIBLE CARE; CONNECTIONS; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article provides empirical evidence on how the pressures of corporate political capital and stakeholders' affect firms' willingness to embrace green innovation. Using a theoretical framework combining the stakeholder theory with the resource-based views (RBV), we investigate the effects of firms' political capital and stakeholders' pressures on corporate green innovation using a survey to 791 private manufacturing firms in China. Our results reveal that: (1) political capital plays a significant but negative role in firms' green product and process innovation performance; (2) both regulations and suppliers positively promote green innovation in product and process; (3) consumers are positively related to green product innovation but negatively related to green process innovation; and (4) competitions do not have any significant effects on both green product and green process innovation. Furthermore, political factors and stakeholders' contingent roles in institutional context should synthetically be considered to initiate green innovation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 72
页数:10
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   Environmental Strategies and Green Product Development: an Overview on Sustainability-Driven Companies [J].
Albino, Vito ;
Balice, Azzurra ;
Dangelico, Rosa Maria .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 18 (02) :83-96
[2]   Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :197-218
[3]   Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives [J].
Baumann, H ;
Boons, F ;
Bragd, A .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2002, 10 (05) :409-425
[4]   Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries [J].
Brunnermeier, SB ;
Cohen, MA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (02) :278-293
[5]   Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective [J].
Buysse, K ;
Verbeke, A .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (05) :453-470
[6]   The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation [J].
Chang, Ching-Hsun .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2011, 104 (03) :361-370
[7]   Origins of green innovations: the differences between proactive and reactive green innovations [J].
Chen, Yu-Shan ;
Chang, Ching-Hsun ;
Wu, Feng-Shang .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2012, 50 (3-4) :368-398
[8]   On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports [J].
Costantini, Valeria ;
Mazzanti, Massimiliano .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (01) :132-153
[9]  
Crane A., 2011, Journal of Business Ethics, V102, P77, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10551-011-1191-4
[10]   Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability [J].
Dangelico, Rosa Maria ;
Pujari, Devashish .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 95 (03) :471-486