An historical analysis of united states experiences using stamp-based revenues for wildlife conservation and habitat protection

被引:4
|
作者
Cohen, Joel I. [1 ]
Altman, Steven [2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Res & Educ Associates, Sci, Urbandale, IA 50322 USA
来源
DISCOVER SUSTAINABILITY | 2021年 / 2卷 / 01期
关键词
Biodiversity funding; Stamp-based revenue; Animal conservation; Conservation history; Extinction; Anthropocene;
D O I
10.1007/s43621-021-00031-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the United States, the transition from unchecked hunting, habitat loss, and species endangerment to an ongoing environmental awakening has been examined through various lenses. Despite this gradual perspective shift, recent reports continue to warn of global declines in species and habitat diversity. As the need for biodiversity conservation grows, nations lag behind in their conservation obligations, creating a funding gap. This paper addresses an untapped potential for funding available from stamp revenue as generated in the United States. We begin with an historical summary of wildlife philatelics and end with specialized stamps providing for biodiversity revenue generation. After the publication of Silent Spring, stamp diversification increased due to the recognition of additional environmental and conservation needs, leading to stamp-based revenue as one means to mitigate funding gaps. Having introduced this term, we provide evidence of its potential to fund biodiversity and animal conservation. Historically, stamp-based revenues began with Migratory Bird Hunting license stamps, followed by the semi-postal Amur tiger cub stamp, and eventually local and state stamps whose purchase provides funding for local conservation needs. Specific successful philatelic funding mechanisms are discussed from the United State, with an eye to future development and expansion intentionally in support of conservation and biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An historical analysis of united states experiences using stamp-based revenues for wildlife conservation and habitat protection
    Joel I. Cohen
    Steven Altman
    Discover Sustainability, 2 (1):
  • [2] The Conservation Reserve Program and wildlife habitat in the southeastern United States
    Carmichael, DB
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1997, 25 (04): : 773 - 775
  • [4] RELATIONSHIPS OF CONSERVATION TILLAGE TO THE QUALITY OF WILDLIFE HABITAT IN ROW-CROP ENVIRONMENTS OF THE MIDWESTERN UNITED-STATES
    WARNER, RE
    HAVERA, SP
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1989, 29 (04) : 333 - 343
  • [5] Tillage soil protection of black soil zone in northeast of China based on analysis of conservation tillage in the United States
    Jia H.
    Ma C.
    Li H.
    Chen Z.
    Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2010, 41 (10): : 28 - 34
  • [6] Allocating resources for land protection using continuous optimization: biodiversity conservation in the United States
    Armsworth, Paul R.
    Benefield, Amy E.
    Dilkina, Bistra
    Fovargue, Rachel
    Jackson, Heather B.
    Le Bouille, Diane
    Nolte, Christoph
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2020, 30 (06)
  • [7] Trends in biodiversity and habitat quantification tools used for market-based conservation in the United States
    Chiavacci, Scott J.
    Pindilli, Emily J.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2020, 34 (01) : 125 - 136
  • [8] Are Natural Resources Conservation Service Range Management Investments Working at Cross-Purposes With Wildlife Habitat Goals on Western United States Rangelands?
    Toombs, Theodore P.
    Roberts, Martha G.
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2009, 62 (04) : 351 - 355
  • [9] Current capacity, bottlenecks, and future projections for offsetting habitat loss using Mitigation and Conservation banking in the United States
    Theis, Sebastian
    Poesch, Mark
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2022, 67
  • [10] A habitat-based population viability analysis for ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in the United States
    Haines, Aaron M.
    Tewes, Michael E.
    Laack, Linda L.
    Horne, Jon S.
    Young, John H.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 132 (04) : 424 - 436