Comparison of methodologies for determination total humidity in two types of Andean corn (Zea mays L.)

被引:4
|
作者
Palacios, H. [1 ]
Tamayo, M. [1 ]
Teran, H. [1 ]
Velasquez, J. [2 ]
Vasquez, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amer, Fac Ingn Agroind, EC-170125 Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador
[2] Inst Nacl Invest Agr, EC-170401 Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador
来源
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2018 (ICSARD 2018) | 2019年 / 250卷
关键词
MOISTURE-CONTENT;
D O I
10.1088/1755-1315/250/1/012071
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Corn is one of the most consumed crops nationwide, where consumption and production increasing constantly. The development improved varieties have been an arduous work for the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIAP-Ecuador), where two varieties stand out from the rest; soft maize (INIAP-122) and the semi hard maize (INIAP-180). These varieties present higher production yield, and tolerance to pests and diseases. Humidity of the grain is a key factor, because it closely related to the storage, processing and marketing of the product. The objective of the research is to evaluate the different moisture methods and their principles. For this research, 7 lots of grain humidity were elaborated (10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%). After this, a homogeneity test was carried out, in which a statistical analysis was applied in order to evaluate the degree of homogeneity within each of the lots. Moisture was measured applying methods a) ISO 6540:2013 method (oven), b) AACC 44-15A method (oven), c) rapid method as Agratronix MT-16 (electric-capacitance), d) Infrared method (thermogravimetric) and e) INIAP method (electric-impedance). All lots of soft and semi hard corn (10-16%) were homogenous before comparison test. There was significant difference between moisture methods tested in both varieties.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of methodologies for determination total humidity in hard corn (Zea mays L.)
    Palacios, H.
    Villamarin, D.
    Velasquez, J.
    Vasquez, W.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2018 (ICSARD 2018), 2019, 250
  • [2] Phenolic profiles of Andean purple corn (Zea mays L.)
    Pedreschi, Romina
    Cisneros-Zevallos, Luis
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2007, 100 (03) : 956 - 963
  • [3] The critical period for weed control in three corn (Zea mays L.) types
    Tursun, Nihat
    Datta, Avishek
    Sakinmaz, Mahmut Sami
    Kantarci, Zekeriya
    Knezevic, Stevan Z.
    Chauhan, Bhagirath Singh
    CROP PROTECTION, 2016, 90 : 59 - 65
  • [4] Comparison of grain starch granule distribution of two kinds of corn kernel(Zea mays L.)
    Cui, Lina
    Dong, Shuting
    Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2013, 28 (12) : 29 - 32
  • [5] Corn (Zea mays L.) response to trifloxysulfuron
    Porterfield, D
    Wilcut, JW
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [6] Extraction of corn colorants (Zea mays L.)
    Cabajal Gamarra, Felix Martin
    Leme, Gisele Costa
    Tambourgi, Elias Basile
    Bittencourt, Edison
    CIENCIA E TECNOLOGIA DE ALIMENTOS, 2009, 29 (01): : 62 - 69
  • [7] Antimutagenic and antioxidant properties of phenolic fractions from Andean purple corn (Zea mays L.)
    Pedreschi, Romina
    Cisneros-Zevallos, Luis
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2006, 54 (13) : 4557 - 4567
  • [8] Determination of management zones in corn (Zea mays L.) based on soil fertility
    Ortega, Rodrigo A.
    Santibanez, Oscar A.
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2007, 58 (01) : 49 - 59
  • [9] Determination of carbon nanotube uptake, translocation, and bioaccumulation in corn (Zea mays L.)
    Parra, Amanda
    Shrestha, Babina
    Irin, Fahmida
    Green, Micah J.
    Canas-Carrell, Jaclyn E.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 246
  • [10] Agronomic performance of yellow corn populations Zea mays L. material in the andean region of the department of Narino
    Cesar Lagos B, Tulio
    Javier Torres M, Francisco
    Andres Benavides C, Carlos
    REVISTA DE CIENCIAS AGRICOLAS, 2015, 32 (01): : 12 - 23