Clinical evidence continuous medical education: a randomised educational trial of an open access e-learning program for transferring evidence-based information - ICEKUBE (Italian Clinical Evidence Knowledge Utilization Behaviour Evaluation) - study protocol

被引:11
|
作者
Moja, Lorenzo [1 ]
Moschetti, Ivan [1 ]
Cinquini, Michela [2 ]
Sala, Valeria [1 ]
Compagnoni, Anna [3 ]
Duca, Piergiorgio [4 ]
Deligant, Christian [5 ]
Manfrini, Roberto [5 ]
Clivio, Luca
Satolli, Roberto [5 ]
Addis, Antonio [6 ]
Grimshaw, Jeremy M. [7 ]
Dri, Pietro [5 ]
Liberati, Alessandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Mario Negri Inst Pharmacol Res, Italian Cochrane Ctr, I-20157 Milan, Italy
[2] Mario Negri Inst Pharmacol Res, Dipartimento Oncol, I-20157 Milan, Italy
[3] Sendo Fdn, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Milan, Italy
[5] Zadig Sci Publisher, Milan, Italy
[6] Italian Drug Agcy AIFA, Rome, Italy
[7] Univ Ottawa, Inst Populat Hlth, Ctr Best Practice, Ottawa Hlth Res Inst,Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1748-5908-3-37
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In an effort to ensure that all physicians have access to valid and reliable evidence on drug effectiveness, the Italian Drug Agency sponsored a free-access e-learning system, based on Clinical Evidence, called ECCE. Doctors have access to an electronic version and related clinical vignettes. Correct answers to the interactive vignettes provide Continuing Medical Education credits. The aims of this trial are to establish whether the e-learning program ( ECCE) increases physicians' basic knowledge about common clinical scenarios, and whether ECCE is superior to the passive diffusion of information through the printed version of Clinical Evidence. Design: All Italian doctors naive to ECCE will be randomised to three groups. Group one will have access to ECCE for Clinical Evidence chapters and vignettes lot A and will provide control data for Clinical Evidence chapters and vignettes lot B; group two vice versa; group three will receive the concise printed version of Clinical Evidence. There are in fact two designs: a before and after pragmatic trial utilising a two by two incomplete block design ( group one versus group two) and a classical design (group one and two versus group three). The primary outcome will be the retention of Clinical Evidence contents assessed from the scores for clinical vignettes selected from ECCE at least six months after the intervention. To avoid test-retest effects, we will randomly select vignettes out of lot A and lot B, avoiding repetitions. In order to preserve the comparability of lots, we will select vignettes with similar, optimal psychometric characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Clinical evidence continuous medical education: a randomised educational trial of an open access e-learning program for transferring evidence-based information – ICEKUBE (Italian Clinical Evidence Knowledge Utilization Behaviour Evaluation) – study protocol
    Lorenzo Moja
    Ivan Moschetti
    Michela Cinquini
    Valeria Sala
    Anna Compagnoni
    Piergiorgio Duca
    Christian Deligant
    Roberto Manfrini
    Luca Clivio
    Roberto Satolli
    Antonio Addis
    Jeremy M Grimshaw
    Pietro Dri
    Alessandro Liberati
    Implementation Science, 3
  • [2] Implementation of a Smoking Cessation e-Learning Education Program for Oncology Clinic Healthcare Providers: Evaluation With Implications for Evidence-Based Practice
    Chase, Weihong
    Zurmehly, Joyce
    Amaya, Megan
    Browning, Kristine K.
    WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2020, 17 (06) : 476 - 482
  • [3] Evaluating the impact of an evidence-based medicine educational intervention on primary care doctors' attitudes, knowledge and clinical behaviour: a controlled trial and before and after study
    Shuval, Kerem
    Berkovits, Eldar
    Netzer, Doron
    Hekselman, Igal
    Linn, Shai
    Brezis, Mayer
    Reis, Shmuel
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2007, 13 (04) : 581 - 598
  • [4] IMPLEmenting a clinical practice guideline for acute low back pain evidence-based manageMENT in general practice (IMPLEMENT): Cluster randomised controlled trial study protocol
    Joanne E McKenzie
    Simon D French
    Denise A O'Connor
    Jeremy M Grimshaw
    Duncan Mortimer
    Susan Michie
    Jill Francis
    Neil Spike
    Peter Schattner
    Peter M Kent
    Rachelle Buchbinder
    Sally E Green
    Implementation Science, 3
  • [5] IMPLEmenting a clinical practice guideline for acute low back pain evidence-based manageMENT in general practice (IMPLEMENT): Cluster randomised controlled trial study protocol
    McKenzie, Joanne E.
    French, Simon D.
    O'Connor, Denise A.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Mortimer, Duncan
    Michie, Susan
    Francis, Jill
    Spike, Neil
    Schattner, Peter
    Kent, Peter M.
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Green, Sally E.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2008, 3 (1)
  • [6] Impact of a Multifaceted and Clinically Integrated Training Program in Evidence-Based Practice on Knowledge, Skills, Beliefs and Behaviour among Clinical Instructors in Physiotherapy: A Non-Randomized Controlled Study
    Olsen, Nina Rydland
    Bradley, Peter
    Espehaug, Birgitte
    Nortvedt, Monica Wammen
    Lygren, Hildegunn
    Frisk, Bente
    Bjordal, Jan Magnus
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):