Work-related outcomes in randomised placebo-controlled pain trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Wolf, Ingmar [1 ,2 ]
Friede, Tim [1 ]
Hallier, Ernst [2 ]
Straube, Sebastian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Dept Med Stat, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Inst Occupat Social & Environm Med, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Chronic painful conditions; Rheumatic diseases; Randomised controlled trials; Work-related outcomes; LOW-BACK-PAIN; MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; ACTIVE RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DOUBLE-BLIND; ANKYLOSING-SPONDYLITIS; PSORIATIC-ARTHRITIS; FIBROMYALGIA PAIN; FOLLOW-UP; DULOXETINE;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6673-9-25
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Chronic painful conditions have an important influence on the ability to work. Work-related outcomes, however, are not commonly reported in publications on trials investigating the treatment of chronic painful conditions. We aim to provide an overview of the reporting of work-related outcomes in such trials and investigate the relationship between work-related outcomes and pain outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed with the aim of identifying randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials investigating treatments for chronic painful conditions or rheumatic diseases that also reported on work-related outcomes. Methodological study quality was assessed with the Oxford Quality Scale (OQS). Meta-analyses were conducted for the outcomes of interference with work and number of patients with at least 30% reduction in pain intensity (30% pain responders). The correlation between work-related and pain outcomes was investigated with regression analyses. Results: We included 31 publications reporting on 27 datasets from randomised placebo-controlled trials (with a total of 11,434 study participants) conducted in chronic painful or rheumatic diseases and reporting on work-related outcomes. These 31 publications make up only about 0.2% of all publications on randomised placebo-controlled trials in such conditions. The methodological quality of the included studies was high; only nine studies scored less than four (out of a maximum five) points on the OQS. Sixteen different work-related outcomes were reported on in the studies. Of 25 studies testing for the statistical significance of changes in work-related outcomes over the course of the trials, 14 (56%) reported a significant improvement; the others reported non-significant changes. Eight studies reported data on both interference with work and 30% pain responders: meta analyses demonstrated similar, statistically significant improvements in both these outcomes with active therapy compared to placebo and regression analysis showed that these outcomes were correlated. Conclusions: Despite the importance of pain as a reason for decreased ability to work, work-related outcomes are reported in substantially less than 1% of publications on placebo-controlled trials in chronic painful and rheumatic diseases. Work-related outcomes and pain responder outcomes are closely related.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Work-related outcomes in randomised placebo-controlled pain trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ingmar Wolf
    Tim Friede
    Ernst Hallier
    Sebastian Straube
    Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 9
  • [2] Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mathie R.T.
    Lloyd S.M.
    Legg L.A.
    Clausen J.
    Moss S.
    Davidson J.R.T.
    Ford I.
    Systematic Reviews, 3 (1) : 1 - 16
  • [3] Placebo-Controlled Trials in Surgery A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Probst, Pascal
    Grummich, Kathrin
    Harnoss, Julian C.
    Huettner, Felix J.
    Jensen, Katrin
    Braun, Silvia
    Kieser, Meinhard
    Ulrich, Alexis
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Diener, Markus K.
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (17)
  • [4] Veterinary homeopathy: meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials
    Mathiel, Robert T.
    Clausen, Juergen
    HOMEOPATHY, 2015, 104 (01) : 3 - 8
  • [5] Is patellofemoral pain preventable? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Culvenor, Adam G.
    van Middelkoop, Marienke
    Macri, Erin M.
    Crossley, Kay M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 55 (07) : 378 - +
  • [6] Pilates for neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Martini, Josehelen D.
    Ferreira, Giovanni E.
    de Araujo, Francisco Xavier
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2022, 31 : 37 - 44
  • [7] Manual Therapy Effect in Placebo-Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Molina-alvarez, Miguel
    Arribas-Romano, Alberto
    Rodriguez-Rivera, Carmen
    Garcia, Miguel M.
    Fernandez-Carnero, Josue
    Armijo-Olivo, Susan
    Goicoechea Garcia, Carlos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)
  • [8] EMLA (lidocaine-prilocaine) cream for pain relief during hysterosalpingography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials
    Abu-Zaid, Ahmed
    Baradwan, Saeed
    Abuzaid, Mohammed
    AlSghan, Rayan
    Alomar, Osama
    Salem, Hany
    Al-Badawi, Ismail A.
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2023, 26 (05) : 978 - 986
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of paracetamol for spinal pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials
    Machado, Gustavo C.
    Maher, Chris G.
    Ferreira, Paulo H.
    Pinheiro, Marina B.
    Lin, Chung-Wei Christine
    Day, Richard O.
    McLachlan, Andrew J.
    Ferreira, Manuela L.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [10] Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo/sham controlled randomised trials of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain
    Duarte, Rui, V
    Nevitt, Sarah
    McNicol, Ewan
    Taylor, Rod S.
    Buchser, Eric
    North, Richard B.
    Eldabe, Sam
    PAIN, 2020, 161 (01) : 24 - 35