Gender disparities in lung cancer survival from an enriched Florida population-based cancer registry

被引:11
|
作者
Elkbuli, Adel [1 ,2 ]
Byrne, Margaret M. [1 ,5 ]
Zhao, Wei [5 ]
Sutherland, Mason [2 ]
McKenney, Mark [2 ,4 ]
Godinez, Yeissen [3 ]
Dave, Devina J. [1 ]
Bouzoubaa, Layla [1 ,5 ]
Koru-Sengul, Tulay [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Miller Sch Med, Don Soffer Clin Res Ctr, 1120 NW 14th St, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Kendall Reg Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 11750 SW 40th St, Miami, FL 33175 USA
[3] Kendall Reg Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, 11750 SW 40th St, Miami, FL 33175 USA
[4] Univ S Florida, Dept Surg, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[5] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Sylvester Comprehens Canc Ctr, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136 USA
来源
关键词
Lung cancer survival; Health inequalities; Gender disparity; Socioeconomic status; Healthcare access; SEX-DIFFERENCES; CELL; ASSOCIATION; MORTALITY; WOMEN; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.081
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Previous studies have revealed gender disparities in lung cancer survivorship, but comprehensive inclusion of clinical/individual variables which affect outcomes is underreported. We utilized the Florida Data Cancer System (FCDS) to examine associations between gender and lung cancer survivorship while controlling for prognostic variables on a large population-based scale. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis utilizing the FCDS, linked to Florida Agency for Health Care Administration and US Census Bureau tracts for patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer (n = 165,465) from 1996 to 2007. Primary outcome measures included median survival time and mortality. Multivariable Cox regression models, independent sample T-tests, and descriptive statistics were utilized with significance defined as p < 0.05. Results: 165,465 cases were analyzed revealing 44.3% females and 55.7% males. The majority of patients were white/Caucasian, males, middle-high socioeconomic status, lived in urban areas, and geriatric age. Females had longer median survival compared to males (9.6 vs 7.1 months). Multivariable analyses showed that women had better survival after controlling for sociodemographic, clinical, and comorbidity covariates. Males had higher risk of mortality than females (aHR = 1.17, 95%CI 1.14-1.19, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Individuals of higher socioeconomic status experienced greater survivorship compared to those of lower socioeconomic status. Women experienced significantly better survival for lung cancer at multiple time frames after controlling for covariates compared to men. Interventions aimed at public education and access to high-quality healthcare are needed to ameliorate socioeconomic and gender-based disparities in lung cancer survivorship. Future studies should investigate gender differences in lung cancer while incorporating individual socioeconomic status and treatment received.
引用
收藏
页码:680 / 685
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Survival disparities in pediatric skin cancer: Analysis of population-based Florida cancer registry (1981-2009).
    Dunn, Erin
    Moore, Kevin Joseph
    Miao, Feng
    Koru-Sengul, Tulay
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [2] Occupational disparities in bladder cancer survival: A population-based cancer registry study in Japan
    Zaitsu, Masayoshi
    Lee, Hye-Eun
    Lee, Sangchul
    Takeuchi, Takumi
    Kobayashi, Yasuki
    Kawachi, Ichiro
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (03): : 894 - 901
  • [3] Disparities in localized malignant lung cancer surgical treatment: A population-based cancer registry analysis
    Mamudu, Lohuwa
    Salmeron, Bonita
    Odame, Emmanuel A.
    Atandoh, Paul H.
    Reyes, Joanne L.
    Whiteside, Martin
    Yang, Joshua
    Mamudu, Hadii M.
    Williams, Faustine
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (06): : 7427 - 7437
  • [4] Socioeconomic disparities in endometrial cancer survival in Germany: a survival analysis using population-based cancer registry data
    Ahmed Bedir
    Semaw Ferede Abera
    Dirk Vordermark
    Daniel Medenwald
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2022, 148 : 1087 - 1095
  • [5] Socioeconomic disparities in endometrial cancer survival in Germany: a survival analysis using population-based cancer registry data
    Bedir, Ahmed
    Abera, Semaw Ferede
    Vordermark, Dirk
    Medenwald, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 148 (05) : 1087 - 1095
  • [6] Gender and Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Survival: A Population-Based Study
    Ramai, Daryl
    Kani, Tarik
    Madedor, Ogenetega
    Brooks, Olivia W.
    Ofosu, Andrew
    Barakat, Mohamed
    Dhindsa, Banreet S.
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Dhaliwal, Amaninder
    Etienne, Denzil
    Chang, Shannon
    Adler, Douglas G.
    Reddy, Madhavi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 : S105 - S105
  • [7] Survival for colon and rectal cancer in a population-based cancer registry
    Roncucci, L
    Fante, R
    Losi, L
    DiGregorio, C
    Micheli, A
    Benatti, P
    Madenis, N
    Ganazzi, D
    Cassinadri, MT
    Lauriola, P
    deLeon, MP
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (02) : 295 - 302
  • [8] Lung Cancer and Prognosis in Taiwan: A Population-Based Cancer Registry
    Wang, Bing-Yen
    Huang, Jing-Yang
    Cheng, Ching-Yuan
    Lin, Ching-Hsiung
    Ko, Jiunn- Liang
    Liaw, Yung-Po
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8 (09) : 1128 - 1135
  • [9] Cancer survival: left truncation and comparison of results from hospital-based cancer registry and population-based cancer registry
    Chen, Jian-Guo
    Chen, Hai-Zhen
    Zhu, Jian
    Shen, Ai-Guo
    Sun, Xiang-Yang
    Parkin, Donald Maxwell
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [10] SMOKING INTENSITY AS A PREDICTOR OF SURVIVAL IN BLADDER CANCER PATIENTS: RESULTS FROM A POPULATION-BASED FLORIDA CANCER REGISTRY (1981-2009)
    Savio, Luis Felipe
    Koru-Sengul, Tulay
    Lopategui, Diana M.
    Miao, Feng
    Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana
    Nahar, Bruno
    Venkatramani, Vivek
    Swain, Sanjaya
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Ritch, Chad
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E35 - E35