Comparative Effectiveness of SGLT2 Inhibitors, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, DPP-4 Inhibitors, and Sulfonylureas on Risk of Kidney Outcomes: Emulation of a Target Trial Using Health Care Databases

被引:93
|
作者
Xie, Yan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bowe, Benjamin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gibson, Andrew K. [1 ,3 ]
McGill, Janet B. [4 ]
Maddukuri, Geetha [5 ]
Yan, Yan [6 ]
Al-Aly, Ziyad [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] VA St Louis Hlth Care Syst, Clin Epidemiol Ctr, Res & Dev Serv, St Louis, MO 63106 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Coll Publ Hlth & Social Justice, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[3] Vet Res & Educ Fdn, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[5] VA St Louis Hlth Care Syst, Med Serv, Nephrol Sect, St Louis, MO 63106 USA
[6] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Publ Hlth Sci, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[7] Washington Univ, Inst Publ Hlth, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS; PROPENSITY SCORE; EMPAGLIFLOZIN; BIAS;
D O I
10.2337/dc20-1890
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To examine the comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4), and sulfonylureas on risk of kidney outcomes among people with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS U.S. veterans initiated on SGLT2i (n= 18,544), GLP-1 (n= 23,711), DPP-4 (n= 39,399), or sulfonylureas (n= 134,904) were followed for up to 3 years to evaluate the risk of the composite outcome of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline >50%, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), or all-cause mortality. Risks were estimated using survival models adjusted for predefined covariates as well as covariates identified by a high-dimensional variable selection algorithm through application of generalized propensity scores. RESULTS Compared with those treated with sulfonylureas, treatment with SGLT2i, GLP-1, and DPP-4 was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome (hazard ratio 0.68 [95% CI 0.63, 0.74], 0.72 [0.67, 0.77], and 0.90 [0.86, 0.95], respectively). While we did not observe a statistically significant difference in risk between the SGLT2i and GLP-1 arms (0.95 [0.87, 1.04]), both SGLT2i and GLP-1 had a lower risk of the composite outcome than DPP-4 (0.76 [0.70, 0.82] and 0.79 [0.74, 0.85], respectively). Analyses by eGFR category suggested that compared with the sulfonylurea arm, those in the SGLT2i and GLP-1 arms exhibited a lower risk of the composite outcome in all eGFR categories, including eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Compared with DPP-4, both SGLT2i and GLP-1 exhibited a reduced risk of the composite outcome in eGFR <90 to >= 60, <60 to >= 45, and CONCLUSIONS In type 2 diabetes, treatment with SGLT2i or GLP-1 compared with DPP-4 or sulfonylureas was associated with a lower risk of adverse kidney outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:2859 / 2869
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, and sulfonylureas on risk of major adverse cardiovascular events: emulation of a randomised target trial using electronic health records
    Xie, Yan
    Bowe, Benjamin
    Xian, Hong
    Loux, Travis
    McGill, Janet B.
    Al-Aly, Ziyad
    LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 11 (09): : 644 - 656
  • [2] SGLT2 Inhibitors, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, and DPP-4 Inhibitors and Risk of All-Cause Hospitalization
    Lyu, Beini
    Grams, Morgan
    Chang, Alex R.
    Inker, Lesley A.
    Coresh, Josef
    Shin, Jung-Im
    DIABETES, 2021, 70
  • [3] The cardiovascular safety trials of DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists, and SGLT2 inhibitors
    Secrest, Matthew H.
    Udell, Jacob A.
    Filion, Kristian B.
    TRENDS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2017, 27 (03) : 194 - 202
  • [4] SGLT2 Inhibitors, GLP-1 Agonists, and DPP-4 Inhibitors in Diabetes and Microvascular Complications: A Review
    El Mouhayyar, Christopher
    Riachy, Ruba
    Khalil, Abir Bou
    Eid, Asaad
    Azar, Sami
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [5] Comparative Effectiveness of SGLT-2 Inhibitors, DPP-4 Inhibitors, and GLP-1 Agonists in US Veterans with and Without CKD
    Narasaki, Yoko
    Kovesdy, Csaba P.
    You, Amy S.
    Potukuchi, Praveen Kumar
    Dashputre, Ankur A.
    Sumida, Keiichi
    Thomas, Fridtjof
    Streja, Elani
    Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar
    Rhee, Connie
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 32 (10): : 264 - 264
  • [6] Mortality Differences SGLT-2, DPP-4 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
    不详
    DIABETES STOFFWECHSEL UND HERZ, 2018, 27 (03): : 173 - 173
  • [7] COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF SGLT2 INHIBITORS, DPP-4 INHIBITORS, AND GLP-1 AGONISTS ON INCIDENT ALBUMINURIA AND GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE DECLINE IN US VETERANS
    Rhee, Connie
    Narasaki, Yoko
    You, Amy
    Potukuchi, Praveen
    Dashputre, Ankur
    Sumida, Keiichi
    Thomas, Fridtjof
    Streja, Elani
    Kalantar-Zadeh, Kam
    Kovesdy, Csaba
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2022, 79 (04) : S121 - S121
  • [8] Comparative Cardiovascular Efficacy of SGLT2 Inhibitors, DPP-4 Inhibitors, and GLP-1 Agonists-A Network Meta-analysis
    Roddick, Alistair J.
    Zheng, Sean
    DIABETES, 2018, 67
  • [9] The effects of GLP-1 analogues, DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT2 inhibitors on the renal system
    Schernthaner, Guntram
    Mogensen, Carl Erik
    Schernthaner, Gerit-Holger
    DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE RESEARCH, 2014, 11 (05): : 306 - 323
  • [10] Comparative Cardiovascular Effectiveness and Safety of SGLT-2 Inhibitors, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, and DPP-4 Inhibitors According to Frailty in Type 2 Diabetes
    Kutz, Alexander
    Kim, Dae Hyun
    Wexler, Deborah J.
    Liu, Jun
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    Glynn, Robert J.
    Patorno, Elisabetta
    DIABETES CARE, 2023, 46 (11) : 2004 - 2014