The moderating role of reward systems in the relationship between market orientation and new product performance in China

被引:58
作者
Wei, Yinghong [1 ]
Atuahene-Gima, Kwaku [2 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, William S Spears Sch Business, Tulsa, OK 74106 USA
[2] China Europe Int Business Sch, Shanghai 201206, Peoples R China
关键词
reward; market orientation; new product performance; cross-functional coordination; interface between marketing and HRM; innovation; BUSINESS STRATEGY; FIRM PERFORMANCE; REGULATORY FOCUS; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; COMPENSATION; PREVENTION; PROMOTION; INTERFACE; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.11.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Extant studies concerning the relationship between market orientation and new product performance have produced inconclusive results. Drawing on the contingency theory, the authors argue that one reason for these mixed results may be the lack of an appropriate reward system within the new product development process. This study theoretically and empirically examines the moderating role of reward systems in the relationship between market orientation and new product performance. The authors conducted interviews and surveys in China. The moderating effects suggest that Chinese firms should simultaneously use both a high-level, long-term-oriented reward system and a low-level, risk-taking reward system in order to enhance the positive effects of market orientation on new product performance. The results provide a more refined understanding of how the interplay between marketing and human resource management influences the implementation of market orientation and new product innovation. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 96
页数:8
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Aiken L.S., 1991, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
[2]   The role of the reward system for a total quality management based strategy [J].
Allen, RS ;
Kilmann, RH .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 2001, 14 (02) :110-131
[3]  
Anderson JC., 1988, Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
[4]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[5]   Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation [J].
Atuahene-Gima, K .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2005, 69 (04) :61-83
[6]  
Atuahene-Gima K, 2004, ACAD MANAGE J, V47, P583, DOI [10.2307/20159603, 10.5465/20159603]
[7]   ASSESSING CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
LI, YJ ;
PHILLIPS, LW .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1991, 36 (03) :421-458
[8]   MATCHING COMPENSATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGIES [J].
BALKIN, DB ;
GOMEZMEJIA, LR .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1990, 11 (02) :153-169
[9]   Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation? [J].
Balkin, DB ;
Markman, GD ;
Gomez-Mejia, LR .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (06) :1118-1129
[10]   TOWARD A CONTINGENCY THEORY OF COMPENSATION STRATEGY [J].
BALKIN, DB ;
GOMEZMEJIA, LR .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1987, 8 (02) :169-182