The role of multi-target policy instruments in agri-environmental policy mixes

被引:25
|
作者
Schader, Christian [1 ]
Lampkin, Nicholas [2 ]
Muller, Adrian [1 ,3 ]
Stolze, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Res Inst Organ Farming FiBL, Dept Socioecon, CH-5070 Frick, Switzerland
[2] Aberystwyth Univ, Wales Inst Rural Sci, Aberystwyth SY23 3AL, Dyfed, Wales
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol Zurich ETHZ, Inst Environm Decis IED, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Agri-environmental policy; Direct payments; Cost-effectiveness; Organic farming; Policy targets; Economies of scope; Tinbergen Rule; CLIMATE-CHANGE; AGRICULTURAL SECTOR; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; ANIMAL-WELFARE; IMPACTS; METAANALYSIS; CONSTRAINTS; MITIGATION; ECONOMIES; PROGRAMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Tinbergen Rule has been used to criticise multi-target policy instruments for being inefficient The aim of this paper is to clarify the role of multi-target policy instruments using the case of agri-environmental policy. Employing an analytical linear optimisation model, this paper demonstrates that there is no general contradiction between multi-target policy instruments and the Tinbergen Rule, if multi-target policy instruments are embedded in a policy-mix with a sufficient number of targeted instruments. We show that the relation between cost-effectiveness of the instruments, related to all policy targets, is the key determinant for an economically sound choice of policy instruments. If economies of scope with respect to achieving policy targets are realised, a higher cost-effectiveness of multi-target policy instruments can be achieved. Using the example of organic farming support policy, we discuss several reasons why economies of scope could be realised by multi-target agri-environmental policy instruments. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 190
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条