Using faecal sterols from humans and animals to distinguish faecal pollution in receiving waters

被引:373
|
作者
Leeming, R [1 ]
Ball, A [1 ]
Ashbolt, N [1 ]
Nichols, P [1 ]
机构
[1] AWT ENSIGHT,W RYDE,NSW 2114,AUSTRALIA
关键词
animal; faecal pollution; sterols; water quality; coprostanol; biomarkers;
D O I
10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00011-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The sterol content of faeces from humans and 14 species of animals common to rural or urban environments were examined. The major human faecal sterol was the 5 beta-stanol, coprostanol which constituted approximate to 60% of the total sterols found in human faeces. The sterol profiles of herbivores were dominated by C-29 sterols and 5 beta-stanols were generally in equal or greater abundance than 5 alpha-stanols. The principal faecal biomarker of herbivores was 24-ethylcoprostanol. The sterol content of bird faeces was extremely variable and largely dependent on the animals diet. Both 5 beta and 5 alpha stanols were in very low abundance in birds and dogs faeces from this study presumably due to the absence or low activity of the necessary anaerobic biota required to reduce Delta(5)- or Delta(5,22)-sterols to stanols. Cats and pigs were the only animals that had similar faecal sterol profiles to humans. However, the concentration of the principal human biomarker coprostanol was some 10 times more abundant on a dry weight basis in the faeces of humans than in those of cats and pigs. The source specificity of faecal sterol biomarkers is a combination of sterol intake, metabolic production of sterols and the biota resident within the animal's digestive tract. The ''sterol fingerprints'' of the faeces of humans and animals are sufficiently distinctive to be of diagnostic value in determining whether faecal pollution in water samples are of human or animal origin. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:2893 / 2900
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Studies to distinguish between human and animal faecal pollution using F-RNA coliphages and faecal sterols
    Umgeni Water, PO Box 9, Pietermaritzburg 3200, South Africa
    不详
    Water SA, 2006, 5 SPEC. ISS. (627-632)
  • [2] Determination of faecal pollutants in Torrens and Patawalonga catchment waters in South Australia using faecal sterols
    Suprihatin, I
    Fallowfield, H
    Bentham, R
    Cromar, N
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 47 (7-8) : 283 - 289
  • [3] Faecal pollution in Australian waters
    Leeming, R.
    Chemistry in Australia, 64 (07):
  • [4] Faecal sterols analysis for the identification of human faecal pollution in a non-sewered catchment
    Sullivan, D.
    Brooks, P.
    Tindale, N.
    Chapman, S.
    Ahmed, W.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 61 (05) : 1355 - 1361
  • [5] Modelling faecal bacteria pathways in receiving waters
    Schnauder, I.
    Bockelmann-Evans, B.
    Lin, B.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MARITIME ENGINEERING, 2007, 160 (04) : 143 - 153
  • [6] Evaluating potential applications of faecal sterols in distinguishing sources of faecal contamination from mixed faecal samples
    Shah, Vikaskumar G.
    Dunstan, R. Hugh
    Geary, Phillip M.
    Coombes, Peter
    Roberts, Mothy K.
    Von Nagy-Felsobuki, Ellak
    WATER RESEARCH, 2007, 41 (16) : 3691 - 3700
  • [7] A PCR marker for detection in surface waters of faecal pollution derived from ducks
    Devane, Megan L.
    Robson, Beth
    Nourozi, Fariba
    Scholes, Paula
    Gilpin, Brent J.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2007, 41 (16) : 3553 - 3560
  • [8] Confirmed faecal pollution to bore well waters of Mysore city
    Nagaraju, D
    Sastri, JCV
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 1999, 38 (04): : 322 - 326
  • [9] Faecal pollution in the cooling waters at Setubal power plant, Portugal
    Hall, L.B.
    1600, (18): : 4 - 5
  • [10] Differentiation of faecal Escherichia coli from humans and animals by multiple antibiotic resistance analysis
    Vantarakis, A
    Venieri, D
    Komninou, G
    Papapetropoulou, M
    LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 42 (01) : 71 - 77