Farmer-participatory evaluation of cowpea integrated pest management (IPM) technologies in Eastern Uganda

被引:19
|
作者
Nabirye, J
Nampala, P
Ogenga-Latigo, MW
Kyamanywa, S
Wilson, H
Odeke, V
Iceduna, C
Adipala, E
机构
[1] Makerere Univ, Dept Crop Sci, Kampala, Uganda
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Entomol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Kumi Agr Off, Kumi, Uganda
[4] Pallisa, Agr Off, Pallisa, Uganda
关键词
cultural practices; farmer field schools; spraying; verifying; Vigna unguiculata;
D O I
10.1016/S0261-2194(02)00094-7
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A three-season study was conducted with the goal of verifying integrated pest management (IPM) technologies developed at Makerere University for management of cowpea field pests. Ten IPM-field schools with 10-20 farmers were run for three consecutive seasons of 2000 A (first rains), 2000 B (second rains), and 2001 A. Each school evaluated seven treatments that included farmers' practices; cowpea monoculture and cowpea/sorghurn intercrop mixtures, and five varying insecticide spray regimes. The key insect pests targeted by the sprays included aphids, Aphis craceivora Koch, flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedi Trybom, the legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata Fabricius (formerly M. testularis Geyer), and a range of pod sucking bugs (i.e., Nezera viridula Linnaeus, Clavigralla tomentosicollis Stal., Riptortus dentipes Fab.). The experiment was a randomized complete block design with farms (i.e., field schools) as replicates. Results indicated that combining cultural practices and spraying once each at budding, flowering, and podding stages was more effective and profitable than spraying cowpea weekly throughout the growing season. An IPM practice which combined early planting, close spacing cowpea (30 x 20 cm 2), and three insecticide applications once each at budding, flowering and podding stages, had the highest yields of 791 kg/ha with a 51% yield gain over the farmers' traditional practices. Farmer evaluation over the three seasons revealed that this practice was most preferred by farmers, with a farmer preference of 46.4%, 57.1%, 71.4%, and 89.3% at planting, vegetative, flowering and harvesting evaluation stages, respectively. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 38
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Participatory research in integrated pest management: Lessons from the IPM CRSP
    Norton G.W.
    Rajotte E.G.
    Gapud V.
    Agriculture and Human Values, 1999, 16 (4) : 431 - 439
  • [2] The adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) technologies by cotton growers in the Punjab
    Hussain, Maqsood
    Zia, Sarwat
    Saboor, Abdul
    SOIL & ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 30 (01) : 74 - 77
  • [3] Development of integrated pest management technology for sesame (Sesamum indicum) and its evaluation in farmer participatory mode
    Ahuja, D. B.
    Rajpurohit, T. S.
    Singh, Malam
    Solanki, Z. S.
    Kalyan, R. K.
    Ahuja, Usha Rani
    Dhandapani, A.
    Sundria, M. M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2009, 79 (10): : 808 - 812
  • [4] Evaluation of Integrated Pest and Disease Management Module for Shallots in Tamil Nadu, India: a Farmer's Participatory Approach
    Dinakaran, D.
    Gajendran, G.
    Mohankumar, S.
    Karthikeyan, G.
    Thiruvudainambi, S.
    Jonathan, E. I.
    Samiyappan, R.
    Pfeiffer, D. G.
    Rajotte, E. G.
    Norton, G. W.
    Miller, S.
    Muniappan, R.
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT, 2013, 4 (02) : 1 - 9
  • [5] Impact of integrated pest management (IPM) in California
    Farrar, J.
    Baur, M.
    Elliott, S.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2016, 106 (12) : 197 - 198
  • [6] INTEGRATED PEST-MANAGEMENT (IPM) FOR TURFGRASS
    BRUNEAU, A
    WATKINS, JE
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1987, 194 : 191 - ENVR
  • [7] Dissemination pathways for drought-tolerant rice cultivars: A farmer-participatory evaluation in the Philippines
    Corales, Aurora M.
    Santos, Royette C.
    Banayo, Nino M. C.
    Bueno, Crisanta S.
    Johnson, David E.
    Kato, Yoichiro
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 15
  • [8] Pest management in cowpea. Part 3. Quantifying the effect of cowpea field pests on grain yields in eastern Uganda
    Karungi, J
    Adipala, E
    Nampala, P
    Ogenga-Latigo, MW
    Kyamanywa, S
    CROP PROTECTION, 2000, 19 (05) : 343 - 347
  • [10] ESTABLISHMENT OF INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT (IPM) IN COTTON THROUGH FARMER FIELD SCHOOL (FFS) IN SAKRAND, SINDH, PAKISTAN
    Mallah, Ghulam Hussain
    Korejo, Akram Khan
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2007, 39 (07) : 2693 - 2697