Commercial banks in investment banking - Conflict of interest or certification role?

被引:214
作者
Puri, M
机构
[1] Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford
关键词
Glass-Steagall; banks; certification; conflict of interest; security pricing;
D O I
10.1016/0304-405X(95)00855-9
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
When commercial banks make loans to firms and also underwrite securities, does this hamper or enhance their role as certifiers of firm value? This paper examines empirically the pricing of bank-underwritten securities as compared to investment-house-underwritten securities over a unique period in the U.S. (pre-Glass-Steagall) when both banks and investment houses were allowed to underwrite securities. The evidence shows that investors were willing to pay higher prices for securities underwritten by banks rather than investment houses. The results support a certification role for banks, which is more valuable for junior and information sensitive securities.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 401
页数:29
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   THE UNDERWRITING EXPERIENCE OF COMMERCIAL BANK AFFILIATES PRIOR TO THE GLASS-STEAGALL ACT - A REEXAMINATION OF EVIDENCE FOR PASSAGE OF THE ACT [J].
ANG, JS ;
RICHARDSON, T .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1994, 18 (02) :351-395
[2]  
[Anonymous], DETERIORATION QUALIT
[3]  
Benston G., 1990, The Separation of Commercial and Investment Banking: The Glass-Steagall Act Revisited and Reconsidered
[4]  
BERLIN M, 1994, IN PRESS BANK EQUITY
[5]  
BOOTH JR, 1986, J FINANC ECON, V15, P213
[6]  
CALOMIRIS C, 1993, CORPORATE FINANCE BE
[7]  
CAROSSO VP, 1970, INVESTMENT BANKING A
[8]   The myth of the security affiliate [J].
Edwards, GW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1942, 37 (218) :225-232
[9]  
FAMA E, 1985, J MONETARY ECON, V15, P5
[10]  
Flannery M.J., 1985, DEREGULATING INVESTM