The German Version of the Gaze Anxiety Rating Scale (GARS): Reliability and Validity

被引:12
|
作者
Domes, Gregor [1 ]
Marx, Lisa [1 ]
Spenthof, Ines [1 ]
Heinrichs, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Dept Psychol, Lab Biol & Personal Psychol, Hugstetter Str 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
EYE-TO-EYE; SOCIAL PHOBIA; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; VISUAL SCANPATH; FEAR; BEHAVIOR; CONTACT; RANK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0150807
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Fear of eye gaze and avoidance of eye contact are core features of social anxiety disorders (SAD). To measure self-reported fear and avoidance of eye gaze, the Gaze Anxiety Rating Scale (GARS) has been developed and validated in recent years in its English version. The main objectives of the present study were to psychometrically evaluate the German translation of the GARS concerning its reliability, factorial structure, and validity. Methods Three samples of participants were enrolled in the study. (1) A non-patient sample (n = 353) completed the GARS and a set of trait questionnaires to assess internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factorial structure, and concurrent and divergent validity. (2) A sample of patients with SAD (n = 33) was compared to a healthy control group (n = 30) regarding their scores on the GARS and the trait measures. Results The German GARS fear and avoidance scales exhibited excellent internal consistency and high stability over 2 and 4 months, as did the original version. The English version's factorial structure was replicated, yielding two categories of situations: (1) everyday situations and (2) situations involving high evaluative threat. GARS fear and avoidance displayed convergent validity with trait measures of social anxiety and were markedly higher in patients with GSAD than in healthy controls. Fear and avoidance of eye contact in situations involving high levels of evaluative threat related more closely to social anxiety than to gaze anxiety in everyday situations. Conclusions The German version of the GARS has demonstrated reliability and validity similar to the original version, and is thus well suited to capture fear and avoidance of eye contact in different social situations as a valid self-report measure of social anxiety and related disorders in the social domain for use in both clinical practice and research.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Testing the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Staden schizophrenia anxiety rating scale
    Du, Chenyuan
    Chen, Jiayue
    Ma, Xiaoyan
    Tu, Wenzhen
    Chen, Langlang
    Liu, Jian
    Zhou, Dan
    Chen, Xinying
    Zhang, Jiulong
    Tian, Hongjun
    Zhuo, Chuanjun
    Jiang, Deguo
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [2] The Calgary depression rating scale for schizophrenia (CDSS):: Reliability and validity data of a German version
    Müller, MJ
    Benkert, O
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 15 : 283S - 283S
  • [3] Validity and Reliability of the Staden Schizophrenia Anxiety Rating Scale
    Van Staden, Werdie
    Dlagnekova, Antonia
    Naidu, Kalai
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (04)
  • [4] Norwegian version of Rating Anxiety in Dementia scale (RAID-N): A reliability and validity study
    Goyal, Alka R.
    Bergh, Sverre
    Engedal, Knut
    Kirkevold, Marit
    Kirkevold, Oyvind
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2015, 27 : S158 - S159
  • [5] Norwegian version of the rating anxiety in dementia scale (RAID-N): a validity and reliability study
    Goyal, Alka R.
    Bergh, Sverre
    Engedal, Knut
    Kirkevold, Marit
    Kirkevold, Oyvind
    AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2017, 21 (12) : 1256 - 1261
  • [6] Reliability and validity of the German version of the OPTION scale
    Hirsch, Oliver
    Keller, Heidemarie
    Mueller-Engelmann, Meike
    Gutenbrunner, Monika Heinzel
    Krones, Tanja
    Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2012, 15 (04) : 379 - 388
  • [7] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the bipolar depression rating scale
    Batmaz, Sedat
    Ozdel, Kadir
    Kocbiyik, Sibel
    Karadag, Hasan
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 55 (06) : 1448 - 1454
  • [8] The Korean Version of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale: Reliability and Validity
    Kang, Eun-Chan
    Kim, Sung-Jin
    Seo, Young-Soo
    Jung, Sung-Soo
    Seo, Beom-Joo
    Ryu, Jeoung-Whan
    Shim, Joo-Cheol
    Moon, Jung-Joon
    Jeon, Dong-Wook
    Park, Kyoung-Duck
    Jung, Do-Un
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 14 (02) : 141 - 149
  • [9] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Hamilton depression rating scale
    Akdemir, A
    Türkçapar, MG
    Örsel, SD
    Demirergi, N
    Dag, I
    Özbay, MH
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 42 (02) : 161 - 165
  • [10] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale
    Turan, Nuray
    Asti, Turkinaz Atabek
    Kaya, Nurten
    GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING, 2017, 40 (01) : 47 - 55