Restoring Confidence: Replacing the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011

被引:0
|
作者
Craig, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Durham Law Sch, Durham, England
来源
MODERN LAW REVIEW | 2018年 / 81卷 / 03期
关键词
Fixed-term Parliaments Act; Prerogative; Statute; Abeyance principle; Frustration principle; Interpretation Act 1978; Dissolution of Parliament; ARTICLE; 50;
D O I
10.1111/1468-2230.12342
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article considers both the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 (FTPA) and the political constitution, to place the former in its political and constitutional context. It begins by setting out the background to the FTPA - which was a part of a Coalition agreement - and considers difficulties with the most commonly-made arguments in favour of fixed-term parliaments. The second part of the article considers the impact and potential practical legal consequences if the FTPA is repealed without any replacement, arguing that it will only be possible to revive the dissolution' prerogative by express words in a new Act. The final part of the article addresses the question of whether the prerogative should be revived, before arguing both that it should not and that a statutory power to call an election should be conferred on the Prime Minister subject to a vote by simple majority in the House of Commons.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 508
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条