First, I suggest that it is possible to make some further improvements upon the Godelian ontological arguments that Pruss develops. Then, I argue that it is possible to parody Pruss's Godelian ontological arguments in a way that shows that they make no contribution towards 'lowering the probability of atheism and raising the probability of theism'. I conclude with some remarks about ways in which the arguments of this paper can be extended to apply to the whole family of Godelian ontological arguments.