Towards a typology of adaptive governance in the digital government context: The role of decision-making and accountability

被引:80
作者
Wang, Cancan [1 ]
Medaglia, Rony [1 ]
Zheng, Lei [2 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Digitalizat, Howitzvej 60, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
[2] Fudan Univ, Sch Int Relat & Publ Affairs, Lab Digital & Mobile Governance, 220 Handan Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Adaptive governance; Digital government; Decision-making; Accountability; COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; NETWORKS; RESILIENCE; INNOVATION; IMPLEMENTATION; PRINCIPLES; DIVERSITY; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.003
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The notion of adaptive governance was originally created to capture forms of collaboration in socio-ecological systems that can respond to rapid changes in the environment. However, such a notion also has a great potential to be transferred and understood in the digital government context, where there is an increasing need to establish forms of collaboration that can respond to swift changes in the environment related to technology and citizen demands. Drawing on the analysis of four cases of IT-related project collaboration, we put forward that the degree of sharing of decision-making power and of accountability between government and non-government actors is critical to developing different types of adaptive governance. Findings show that the distribution of decision-making power and of accountability can be decoupled, resulting in three types of adaptive governance namely polycentric, agile, and organic governance. We contribute to research by detailing and empirically testing the notion of adaptive governance in a digital government context, and to practice by highlighting the role of the distribution of decision-making power and of accountability in devising adaptive governance strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 322
页数:17
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   An adaptive governance approach to disaster-related behavioural health services [J].
Andrew, Simon A. ;
Kendra, James M. .
DISASTERS, 2012, 36 (03) :514-532
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, GOVERNANCE DARK TIME
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, GOV INF Q, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.GIQ.2016.04.001
[4]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[5]   Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework [J].
Bertot, John ;
Estevez, Elsa ;
Janowski, Tomasz .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2016, 33 (02) :211-222
[6]  
Bodin O., 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
[7]   The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? [J].
Bodin, Orjan ;
Crona, Beatrice I. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2009, 19 (03) :366-374
[8]   Public governance: balancing stakeholder power in a network society [J].
Bovaird, T .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 71 (02) :217-228
[9]   Adaptive governance and institutional strategies for climate-induced community relocations in Alaska [J].
Bronen, Robin ;
Chapin, F. Stuart, III .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (23) :9320-9325
[10]  
Brunner RonaldD., 2013, ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE