Sensitivity analysis of the peach bottom turbine trip 2 experiment

被引:0
|
作者
Bousbia-Salah, A [1 ]
D'Auria, F [1 ]
Bambara, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, DIMNP, I-56100 Pisa, Italy
关键词
Delayed feedback mechanism - Peach bottom turbine - Rapid pressure induced positive reactivity mechanism - Thermal hydraulics - Three dimensional neutron modelling;
D O I
10.3139/124.100182
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The recent availability of powerful computer and computational techniques has enlarged the possibilities to perform best estimate simulations of complex scenarios in nuclear power plants. Nowadays, the coupled codes method, which consists in incorporating three-dimensional (3D) neutron modeling of the reactor core into system codes, is extensively used. It is particularly suited for simulating transients that involve core spatial asymmetric phenomena and strong feedback effects between core neutronics and reactor loop thermal-hydraulics. Within this framework the Peach Bottom BWR 2 Turbine Trip test was selected since it involves a rapid pressure induced positive reactivity addition into the core. It is also characterized by a self-limiting power course due to compensated inherent reactivity mechanisms. To perform a numerical simulation of the turbine trip a reference case was run for the coupled thermal-hydraulic system code RELAP5/mod3.3 and 3D neutron kinetic PARCS/2.3 code. The overall data comparison shows good agreements between the calculations and most of the significant global aspects observed experimentally. However, the test is very sensitive to the feedback modeling and requires a tightly accurate simulation of the thermal-hydraulic and the cross sections parameters. For this purpose, sensitivity studies have been carried out in order to identify the most influential parameters that govern the transient behavior. The considered cases showed that the self-limiting power amplitude as predicted by the coupled code calculation is mainly due to delayed feedback mechanisms whereas the experimental data shows that the power quenching before the Scram is governed by prompt feedback effects.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 14
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ANALYSIS OF PEACH BOTTOM TURBINE TRIP TESTS
    CHENG, HS
    LU, MS
    HSU, CJ
    SHIER, WG
    DIAMOND, DJ
    LEVINE, MM
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1979, 31 (MAY): : 102 - 104
  • [2] RETRAN ANALYSIS OF PEACH BOTTOM TURBINE TRIP TESTS
    NASER, JA
    HORNYIK, K
    SEHGAL, BR
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1978, 30 (NOV): : 220 - 221
  • [3] RETRAN ANALYSIS OF THE PEACH BOTTOM TURBINE TRIP TESTS
    NASER, JA
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 54 (03) : 373 - 379
  • [4] RAMONA ANALYSIS OF THE PEACH-BOTTOM TURBINE TRIP TESTS
    MOBERG, L
    NASER, JA
    RASMUSSEN, J
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1980, 34 (JUN): : 503 - 504
  • [5] ANALYSIS OF THE PEACH BOTTOM 2 TURBINE TRIP TRANSIENTS WITH THE PLANT-MODEL ALMOS
    HORNYIK, K
    FRISCH, W
    GILL, R
    ATOMKERNENERGIE-KERNTECHNIK, 1980, 35 (04): : 249 - 254
  • [6] Analysis of the peach bottom turbine trip 2 experiment by coupled RELAP5-PARCS three-dimensional codes
    Bousbia-Salah, A
    Vedovi, J
    D'Auria, F
    Ivanov, K
    Galassi, G
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2004, 148 (02) : 337 - 353
  • [7] PEACH BOTTOM 2 SPECIAL TURBINE TRIP AND PRESSURE PERTURBATION TESTS
    CARMICHAEL, LA
    CRAWFORD, BW
    KANKUS, R
    KOONEY, J
    LINFORD, RB
    NIEMI, RO
    WHITESELL, RN
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1978, 30 (NOV): : 218 - 219
  • [8] MEKIN SIMULATIONS OF THE PEACH BOTTOM-2 TURBINE TRIP EXPERIMENTS
    BURNS, ET
    LIM, EY
    GOZANI, T
    NASER, JA
    ZOLOTAR, BA
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1979, 33 (NOV): : 472 - 473
  • [9] SIMULATE-3K peach bottom 2 turbine trip 2 benchmark calculations
    Belblidia, LA
    Grandi, GM
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2004, 148 (02) : 325 - 336
  • [10] RETRAN ANALYSIS OF THE TURBINE TRIP TESTS PERFORMED AT THE PEACH-BOTTOM-ATOMIC-POWER-STATION-UNIT-2
    HORNYIK, K
    NASER, JA
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1982, 57 (01) : 36 - 49