When does word frequency influence written production?

被引:34
|
作者
Baus, Cristina [1 ]
Strijkers, Kristof [2 ]
Costa, Albert [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Ctr Brain & Cognit, Barcelona 08018, Spain
[2] Univ Aix Marseille, CNRS, Lab Psychol Cognit, Marseille, France
[3] Inst Catalana Recerca & Estudis Avancats, Barcelona, Spain
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2013年 / 4卷
关键词
written word production; typewriting; central and peripheral processes; lexical frequency; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; TIME-COURSE; SPEECH PRODUCTION; LEXICAL ACCESS; COGNITIVE CONTROL; BRAIN POTENTIALS; SET SIZE; PICTURES; ERP; INTERFERENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00963
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to explore the central (e.g., lexical processing) and peripheral processes (motor preparation and execution) underlying word production during typewriting. To do so, we tested non-professional typers in a picture typing task while continuously recording EEG. Participants were instructed to write (by means of a standard keyboard) the corresponding name for a given picture. The lexical frequency of the words was manipulated: half of the picture names were of high-frequency while the remaining were of low-frequency. Different measures were obtained: (1) first keystroke latency and (2) keystroke latency of the subsequent letters and duration of the word. Moreover, ERPs locked to the onset of the picture presentation were analyzed to explore the temporal course of word frequency in typewriting. The results showed an effect of word frequency for the first keystroke latency but not for the duration of the word or the speed to which letter were typed (interstroke intervals). The electrophysiological results showed the expected ERP frequency effect at posterior sites: amplitudes for low-frequency words were more positive than those for high-frequency words. However, relative to previous evidence in the spoken modality, the frequency effect appeared in a later time-window. These results demonstrate two marked differences in the processing dynamics underpinning typing compared to speaking: First, central processing dynamics between speaking and typing differ already in the manner that words are accessed; second, central processing differences in typing, unlike speaking, do not cascade to peripheral processes involved in response execution.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Syllable frequency and word frequency effects in spoken and written word production in a non-alphabetic script
    Zhang, Qingfang
    Wang, Cheng
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [2] Word frequency of written Urdu
    Khan, Quratulain H.
    Buchanan, Lori
    MENTAL LEXICON, 2014, 9 (01): : 131 - 140
  • [3] WORD AFFECT AND WORD FREQUENCY IN WRITTEN ENGLISH
    JOHNSON, RC
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1966, 75 (01): : 35 - &
  • [4] Reflections on production of the written word
    Ponsonby, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2000, 34 (06) : 455 - 455
  • [5] Do activated letters influence lexical selection in written word production?
    Falconer, Carolyn
    Buchwald, Adam
    APHASIOLOGY, 2013, 27 (07) : 849 - 866
  • [6] A written word is worth a thousand spoken words: The influence of spelling on spoken-word production
    Buerki, Audrey
    Spinelli, Elsa
    Gaskell, M. Gareth
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2012, 67 (04) : 449 - 467
  • [7] Word frequency effect in written production: Evidence from ERPs and neural oscillations
    Wang, Cheng
    Zhang, Qingfang
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 58 (05)
  • [8] The Neurotopography of Written Word Production: An fMRI Investigation of the Distribution of Sensitivity to Length and Frequency
    Rapp, Brenda
    Dufor, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 23 (12) : 4067 - 4081
  • [9] WHEN DOES IRREGULAR SPELLING OR PRONUNCIATION INFLUENCE WORD RECOGNITION
    SEIDENBERG, MS
    WATERS, GS
    BARNES, MA
    TANENHAUS, MK
    JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1984, 23 (03): : 383 - 404
  • [10] When the language learner meets the written word
    Teberosky, Ana
    Josep Jarque, Maria
    LLENGUA SOCIETAT I COMUNICACIO, 2016, (14): : 68 - 81