Antipsychotic Adherence and Rehospitalization in Schizophrenia Patients Receiving Oral Versus Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics Following Hospital Discharge

被引:184
|
作者
Marcus, Steven C. [1 ]
Zummo, Jacqueline [2 ]
Pettit, Amy R.
Stoddard, Jeffrey [3 ]
Doshi, Jalpa A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Social Policy & Practice, 3701 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Alkermes Inc, Med & Sci Commun, Waltham, MA USA
[3] Alkermes Inc, Med Profess Serv, Waltham, MA USA
[4] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
关键词
PROPENSITY SCORE METHODS; ATYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTICS; MEDICATION COMPLIANCE; RELAPSE; RECOMMENDATIONS; NONCOMPLIANCE; PERSISTENCE; STRATEGIES; PEOPLE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.9.754
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND:Antipsychotic medications are a central component of effective treatment for schizophrenia, but nonadherence is a significant problem for the majority of patients. Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications are a recommended treatment option for nonadherent patients, but evidence regarding their potential advantages has been mixed. Observational data on newer, second-generation LAI antipsychotic medications have been limited given their more recent regulatory approval and availability. OBJECTIVE: To examine antipsychotic medication nonadherence, discontinuation, and rehospitalization outcomes in Medicaid patients receiving oral versus LAI antipsychotic medications in the 6 months after a schizophrenia-related hospitalization. METHODS: The 2010-2013 Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Medicaid research claims database was used to identify adult patients with a recent history of nonadherence (prior 6 months) who received an oral or LAI antipsychotic medication within 30 days after an index schizophrenia-related hospitalization. Primary outcome measures were nonadherence (proportion of days covered less than <0.80), discontinuation (continuous medication gap >= 60 days), and schizophrenia-related rehospitalization, all in the 6 months after discharge. Descriptive analyses compared users of oral versus LAI antipsychotic medication on sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics. Logistic regressions were used to examine associations between use of oral versus LAI antipsychotics and each study outcome while controlling for observed differences in sample characteristics. All outcomes were compared at 3 levels of analysis: overall LAI class, LAI antipsychotic generation (first-generation [FGA] or second-generation [SGA] antipsychotics), and individual LAI agent (fluphenazine decanoate, haloperidol decanoate, risperidone LAI, and paliperidone palmitate). RESULTS: Of the final sample, 91% (n=3,428) received oral antipsychotics, and 9.0% (n=340) received LAI antipsychotics after discharge. Slightly over half (n=183, 53.8%) of LAI users used an SGA LAI. A smaller percentage of patients receiving LAIs were nonadherent (51.8% vs. 67.7%, P less than 0.001); had a 60-day continuous gap in medication (23.8% vs. 39.4%, P less than 0.001); and were rehospitalized for schizophrenia (19.1% vs. 25.3%, P=0.01) compared with patients receiving oral medications. The size of these differences was magnified when comparing SGA LAI users with users of oral antipsychotics for nonadherence. After controlling for all differences in measured covariates, LAI initiators had lower odds of being nonadherent (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.35, 95% CI=0.27-0.46, P less than 0.001) and of having continuous 60-day gaps (AOR=0.45, 95% CI=0.34-0.60, P less than 0.001) when compared with patients receiving oral medications. Both FGA and SGA LAI users had lower odds of nonadherence compared with patients receiving oral antipsychotics. Similarly, FGA LAI users (AOR=0.58, 95% CI=0.40-0.85, P=0.005) and SGA LAI initiators (AOR=0.34, 95% CI=0.23-0.51, P less than 0.001) had lower odds of a 60-day continuous gap compared with patients receiving oral antipsychotics. Compared with those receiving oral antipsychotics, LAI initiators also had lower odds of rehospitalization (AOR=0.73, 95% CI=0.54-0.99, P=0.041); however, when examined separately, only patients receiving SGA LAIs (AOR=0.59, 95% CI=0.38-0.90, P=0.015) and not FGA LAIs (AOR=0.90, 95% CI=0.60-1.34, P=0.599) had a statistically significant reduction in odds of rehospitalization. Among individual LAIs, odds of rehospitalization only among initiators of paliperidone palmitate were statistically different from those among users of oral antipsychotics (AOR=0.53, 95% CI=0.30-0.94, P=0.031). While odds of rehospitalization were 33% lower among patients receiving risperidone LAI compared with those receiving oral antipsychotics, the estimate did not reach statistical significance (AOR=0.67, 95% CI=0.37-1.22, P=0.194). CONCLUSIONS: This claims-based analysis of posthospitalization adherence and rehospitalization outcomes in Medicaid patients with schizophrenia adds to the growing real-world evidence base of the benefits of LAI antipsychotic medications in routine clinical practice, particularly with regard to second-generation LAIs. As new SGA formulations become available for long-acting use, real-world studies with larger sample sizes will be needed to further delineate their potential advantages in terms of clinical outcomes and costs. Copyright (C) 2015, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 768
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Time to Rehospitalization in Patients With Schizophrenia Receiving Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics or Oral Antipsychotics
    Lin, Ching-Hua
    Chen, Feng-Chua
    Chan, Hung-Yu
    Hsu, Chun-Chi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 22 (09): : 541 - 547
  • [2] Long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics for schizophrenia
    Munkholm, Klaus
    LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 8 (07): : 566 - 567
  • [3] A Comparison of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics With Oral Antipsychotics on Time to Rehospitalization Within 1 Year of Discharge in Elderly Patients With Schizophrenia
    Lin, Ching-Hua
    Chen, Feng-Chua
    Chan, Hung-Yu
    Hsu, Chun-Chi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 28 (01): : 23 - 30
  • [4] Long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics for schizophrenia reply
    Kishimoto, Taishiro
    Hagi, Katsuhiko
    Kurokawa, Shunya
    Kane, John M.
    Correll, Christoph U.
    LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 8 (07): : 567 - 567
  • [5] Medication adherence and discontinuation of long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder
    Greene, Mallik
    Yan, Tingjian
    Chang, Eunice
    Hartry, Ann
    Touya, Maelys
    Broder, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 21 (02) : 127 - 134
  • [6] Concurrent Oral Antipsychotic Drug Use Among Schizophrenia Patients Initiated on Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics Post-Hospital Discharge
    Doshi, Jalpa A.
    Pettit, Amy R.
    Stoddard, Jeffrey J.
    Zummo, Jacqueline
    Marcus, Steven C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 35 (04) : 442 - 446
  • [7] Adherence and Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia: An Update
    Mohr, Pavel
    Volavka, Jan
    DUSUNEN ADAM-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 25 (04): : 285 - 296
  • [8] Invited Perspective on "A Comparison of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics With Oral Antipsychotics on Time to Rehospitalization Within One Year of Discharge in Elderly Patients With Schizophrenia"
    Saxena, Parnika P.
    Small, Gary W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 28 (01): : 31 - 32
  • [9] Analysis of Oral versus Long-acting Injectable Antipsychotics in the Maintenance of Schizophrenia
    Vasiliu, O.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 65 : S322 - S322
  • [10] IMPACT OF LONG-ACTING INJECTABLE VERSUS ORAL ANTIPSYCHOTICS ON REHOSPITALIZATION RATES AND EMERGENCY ROOM VISITS AMONG RELAPSED SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS
    Lafeuille, M. H.
    Laliberte-Auger, F.
    Lefebvre, P.
    Frois, C.
    Fastenau, J.
    Duh, M. S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (04) : A82 - A82