Preferential Market Access Design: Evidence and Lessons from African Apparel Exports to the United States and the European Union

被引:10
|
作者
de Melo, Jaime [1 ,2 ]
Portugal-Perez, Alberto [3 ]
机构
[1] FERDI, Paris, France
[2] Univ Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
[3] World Bank, Washington, DC USA
来源
WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW | 2014年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
FREE-TRADE AGREEMENTS;
D O I
10.1093/wber/lht012
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The least developed countries rely on preferential market access. To benefit from these preferences, proof of sufficient transformation must be provided to customs in importing countries by meeting the rules of origin requirements. These rules of origin are complicated and burdensome to exporters in least developed countries. Since 2001, under the U. S. Africa Growth Opportunity Act (AGOA), 22 African countries that export apparel to the United States have been able to use fabric of any origin (single transformation) and still meet the criterion for preferential access (the so-called Special Rule). In contrast, the EU has continued to require yarn to be woven into fabric and then made into apparel in the same country (double transformation). Panel estimates for the 1996-2004 period exploit this quasi-experimental change in the design of preferences. Estimates show that this simplification contributed to an increase in export volume of approximately 168 percent for the top seven beneficiaries, or approximately four times as much as the 44 percent growth effect from the initial preferential access under the AGOA without single transformation. This change in design was also important for diversity in apparel exports because the number of export varieties grew more rapidly under the AGOA special regime.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 98
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transatlantic moves to the market: the United States and the European Union
    Slaughter, Sheila
    Cantwell, Brendan
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 63 (05) : 583 - 606
  • [2] Transatlantic moves to the market: the United States and the European Union
    Sheila Slaughter
    Brendan Cantwell
    Higher Education, 2012, 63 : 583 - 606
  • [3] Temperature and Exports: Evidence from the United States
    Karlsson, Jimmy
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2021, 80 (02): : 311 - 337
  • [4] Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union
    Mustapha Sadni Jallab
    James B. Kobak
    Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2006, 6 (3-4) : 253 - 275
  • [5] Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union
    Jallab, Mustapha Sadni
    Kobak, James B., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRY COMPETITION & TRADE, 2006, 6 (3-4): : 253 - 275
  • [6] Temperature and Exports: Evidence from the United States
    Jimmy Karlsson
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2021, 80 : 311 - 337
  • [7] Lessons learned from development of natural capital accounts in the United States and European Union
    Bagstad, Kenneth J.
    Ingram, Jane Carter
    Shapiro, Carl D.
    La Notte, Alessandra
    Maes, Joachim
    Vallecillo, Sara
    Casey, C. Frank
    Glynn, Pierre D.
    Heris, Mehdi P.
    Johnson, Justin A.
    Lauer, Chris
    Matuszak, John
    Oleson, Kirsten L. L.
    Posner, Stephen M.
    Rhodes, Charles
    Voigt, Brian
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 52
  • [8] Regulation of the relationship between European Union stock exchanges: Lessons from the United States
    Scott, HS
    EUROPEAN SECURITIES MARKET: THE INVESTMENT SERVICES DIRECTIVE AND BEYOND, 1998, : 283 - 293
  • [9] Design Law: European Union and United States of America
    Factor, Michael
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 2011, 6 (08) : 586 - 588
  • [10] Earnings conservatism: Panel data evidence from the European Union and the United States
    Grambovas, Christos A.
    Giner, Begona
    Christodoulou, Demetris
    ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2006, 42 (3-4): : 354 - 378