Demographic and functional differences among social security disability claimants

被引:3
|
作者
Marino, Molly [1 ,4 ]
Ni, Pengsheng [1 ]
Kazis, Lewis [1 ]
Brandt, Diane [2 ]
Jette, Alan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Law Policy & Management, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] NIH, Dept Rehabil Med, Mark O Hatfield Clin Res Ctr, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Hlth Profess, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Qual Measurement & Hlth Policy Program, RTI Int, 307 Waverly Oaks Rd,Suite 101, Waltham, MA 02452 USA
关键词
Differential item functioning; Psychometrics; Functional assessment; Work disability; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS; HEALTH FUNCTION; ITEM; AGE; EDUCATION; POPULATION; INSTRUMENT; ABILITY; ONSET;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-021-02765-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Sociodemographic characteristics may influence responses on self-reported measures. Differential item functioning (DIF) is when individuals expected to have the same ability level on a construct of interest have a different probability of endorsing an item on an item response theory (IRT) scale due to population characteristics. The goal of this study was to identify DIF for items in an outcome instrument by sociodemographic factors and, one controlling for DIF, assess true differences in function by those same factors. Methods The Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery 2.0 (WD-FAB 2.0) is an IRT-based self-reported measure of activity limitations relevant to work. Two samples from WD-FAB developed were used: 3793 SSA disability claimants randomly drawn from a pool of 16,500 claimants and a general sample if 2100 working age adults. We used a two-step IRT-based DIF method for three pairs of respondent characteristics: age, gender, and race/ethnicity, and calculated the weighted absolute difference between item characteristic curves. Independent two-group T-tests assessed differences in scores across groups. Results Seventeen items displayed DIF. Men had higher scores than women on two physical and two mental function scales. Older respondents had lower physical and higher mental function scores. The lower education group had lower mental function scores. Conclusion DIF impacts function measurement and is important when assessing psychometric characteristics of instruments. Self-report measures should include diverse samples to conduct similar analyses. WD-FAB 2.0 scores are now reflections of function with reduced bias related to gender, race/ethnicity, or age.
引用
收藏
页码:1757 / 1768
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Demographic and functional differences among social security disability claimants
    Molly Marino
    Pengsheng Ni
    Lewis Kazis
    Diane Brandt
    Alan Jette
    Quality of Life Research, 2021, 30 : 1757 - 1768
  • [2] Assessing dissimulation among social security disability income claimants
    Griffin, GAE
    Normington, J
    May, R
    Glassmire, D
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 64 (06) : 1425 - 1430
  • [3] VOCATIONAL APPRAISAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CLAIMANTS
    OVERS, RP
    PERSONNEL AND GUIDANCE JOURNAL, 1968, 47 (04): : 313 - 317
  • [5] EVALUATION OF SOCIAL-SECURITY DISABILITY IN CLAIMANTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASE
    LIANG, MH
    DALTROY, LH
    LARSON, MG
    PARTRIDGE, AJ
    ABELES, M
    TAYLOR, C
    FOSSEL, AH
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 115 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [6] GUIDELINES FOR PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION OF SOCIAL-SECURITY DISABILITY CLAIMANTS
    FOLSOM, J
    LIPSETT, MM
    RASKIN, DE
    HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY, 1983, 34 (11): : 1044 - 1051
  • [7] Predictors of Functional Disability in Disability Welfare Claimants
    Fiona Purdie
    Stephen Kellett
    Darren Bickerstaffe
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2012, 22 : 447 - 455
  • [8] Predictors of Functional Disability in Disability Welfare Claimants
    Purdie, Fiona
    Kellett, Stephen
    Bickerstaffe, Darren
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2012, 22 (04) : 447 - 455
  • [9] General bias and administrative law judges: Is there a remedy for social security disability claimants?
    Vendel, JD
    CORNELL LAW REVIEW, 2005, 90 (03) : 769 - 809
  • [10] Reducing the Probability of False Positives in Malingering Detection of Social Security Disability Claimants
    Chafetz, Michael
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 25 (07) : 1239 - 1252