An Indicator for the Economic Performance and Ecological Sustainability of Nations

被引:18
|
作者
DiMaria, C. -H. [1 ]
机构
[1] STATEC Res, Ctr Adm Pierre Werner, 13 Rue Erasme,BP 304, L-2013 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
关键词
Efficiency; Ecological reserve; Ecological deficit; Data envelopment analysis; Negative output; Anti-efficient frontier; FOOTPRINT; DEA;
D O I
10.1007/s10666-018-9626-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This document proposes a new indicator to assess countries' sustainability. The indicator synthetises measures of economic and ecological efficiency. In other words, we assess the ability of countries to use resources to produce the maximum possible amounts of goods and services while keeping production activities' impact on the environment as low as possible. The measure of ecological efficiency is the ecological reserve/deficit (ERD), which is based on the concept of ecological footprint. The new indicator is computed using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, a well-known non-parametric technique that delivers measures of productive efficiency by comparing outputs to inputs used in production. We modify the standard DEA model in two ways. Firstly, we allow for negative input and output data. Secondly, to increase DEA discriminating power of countries, we compute anti-efficiency measures. This allows us to obtain a ranking of countries based on the best and worst performances. Results show that the new efficiency indicator is valid and that high ERD positively influences the ranking of countries. Introducing anti-efficiency provides more plausible results and a more accurate ranking, for example high-polluting countries like China previously economically efficient are now ranked as low efficient when sustainability is taken into account.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 294
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Indicator for the Economic Performance and Ecological Sustainability of Nations
    C.-H. DiMaria
    Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 2019, 24 : 279 - 294
  • [2] Does economic complexity matter for environmental sustainability? Using ecological footprint as an indicator
    Muhammad Zahid Rafique
    Abdul Majeed Nadeem
    Wanjun Xia
    Majid Ikram
    Hafiz Muhammad Shoaib
    Umer Shahzad
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24 : 4623 - 4640
  • [3] Does economic complexity matter for environmental sustainability? Using ecological footprint as an indicator
    Rafique, Muhammad Zahid
    Nadeem, Abdul Majeed
    Xia, Wanjun
    Ikram, Majid
    Shoaib, Hafiz Muhammad
    Shahzad, Umer
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (04) : 4623 - 4640
  • [4] The ecological footprint of ports -: A sustainability indicator
    Carrera-Gomez, Gema
    Coto-Millan, Pablo
    Domenech, Juan Luis
    Inglada, Vicente
    Pesquera Gonzalez, Miguel Angel
    Castanedo-Galan, Juan
    INLAND WATERWAYS, PORTS, AND SHIPPING, 2006, (1963): : 71 - 75
  • [5] Economic pathways to ecological sustainability
    Dasgupta, P
    Levin, S
    Lubchenco, J
    BIOSCIENCE, 2000, 50 (04) : 339 - 345
  • [6] Quantifying economic and ecological sustainability
    Fath, Brian D.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 108 : 13 - 19
  • [7] Sustainability: Ecological and economic perspectives
    Norton, BG
    Toman, MA
    LAND ECONOMICS, 1997, 73 (04) : 553 - 568
  • [8] Sustainability of nations by indices: Comparative study between environmental sustainability index, ecological footprint and the emergy performance indices
    Siche, J. R.
    Agostinho, F.
    Ortega, E.
    Romeiro, A.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 66 (04) : 628 - 637
  • [9] THE EMERGY AS AN INDICATOR OF ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY TO MEASURE SUSTAINABILITY
    Bravo Amarante, Edelvy
    Lopez Bastida, Eduardo
    Romero Romero, Osvaldo
    Calvo, Alberto E.
    Schulz, Ralf Kiran
    REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD Y SOCIEDAD, 2018, 10 (05): : 78 - 84
  • [10] NATURE AS INDICATOR OF PLACE ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY
    Livina, Agita
    Rozentale, Sarmite
    Smalinskis, Juris
    ECONOMIC SCIENCE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT: INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABLE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, (38): : 92 - 102