Solid waste disposal methodology selection using multi-criteria decision making methods and an application in Turkey

被引:103
|
作者
Arikan, Emre [1 ]
Simsit-Kalender, Zeynep Tugce [2 ]
Vayvay, Ozalp [2 ]
机构
[1] Turkish Air Force Acad, Aeronaut & Space Technol Inst, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Marmara Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Fuzzy; Multi criteria decision making; PROMETHEE; Solid waste disposal; TOPSIS; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; ALTERNATIVES; CITY; GIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.054
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rapidly increasing population, rising living standards and developments in the fields of science and technology cause continuously increase in the quantity and variety of solid waste. This situation results in a further contamination of natural resources. A variety of technologies for solid waste disposal have been developed to reduce the detrimental effects of solid waste to a minimum level. In literature, studies that are focused on solid waste disposal are generally considering thermal, biological, recovery methodologies or they are just devoted for solid waste technologies used in a determined country, city or region. Besides, in this study all alternatives that are currently used all around the world are investigated and suggestions are made based on the idea of possible implementations in Istanbul, Turkey. For that purpose, firstly overview definition and types of solid waste and general information about solid waste management were given. Afterwards, 10 disposal alternatives of solid waste were evaluated via 18 criteria's which are determined by Istanbul Environmental Management Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. experts to select best disposal technology. Three different multi-criteria decision making methods, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution - TOPSIS, Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations - PROMETHEE and Fuzzy TOPSIS were used for the selection. In this comparison current disposal methodologies are evaluated and tried to determine the most feasible one. According to final results, ordered storing and burning systems are selected as top two methodologies for Istanbul case. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 412
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SELECTION OF SOCKS EXPORT MARKETS FOR TURKEY USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS
    Yildiz, Aytac
    Ozbek, Ahmet
    SIGMA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES-SIGMA MUHENDISLIK VE FEN BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2020, 38 (02): : 795 - 815
  • [2] Selection of Waste Disposal Firms Using Grey Theory Based Multi-criteria Decision Making Technique
    Thakur, Vikas
    Ramesh, A.
    OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT IN DIGITAL ECONOMY, 2015, 189 : 81 - 90
  • [3] A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making method for the selection of potential municipal solid waste disposal sites in Mersin, Turkey
    Suleyman Sefa Bilgilioglu
    Cemil Gezgin
    Osman Orhan
    Pınar Karakus
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 5313 - 5329
  • [4] A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making method for the selection of potential municipal solid waste disposal sites in Mersin, Turkey
    Bilgilioglu, Suleyman Sefa
    Gezgin, Cemil
    Orhan, Osman
    Karakus, Pinar
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (04) : 5313 - 5329
  • [5] Using multi-criteria decision making for selection of the optimal strategy for municipal solid waste management
    Jovanovic, Sasa
    Savic, Slobodan
    Jovicic, Nebojsa
    Boskovic, Goran
    Djordjevic, Zorica
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2016, 34 (09) : 884 - 895
  • [6] An integrated multi-criteria decision-making method for hazardous waste disposal site selection
    Feng, Jianghong
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (06) : 8039 - 8070
  • [7] An integrated multi-criteria decision-making method for hazardous waste disposal site selection
    Jianghong Feng
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24 : 8039 - 8070
  • [8] Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey
    Coban, Asli
    Ertis, Irem Firtina
    Cavdaroglu, Nur Ayvaz
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 180 : 159 - 167
  • [9] Selection of Construction Equipment by Using Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods
    Temiz, I.
    Calis, G.
    CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE 2017, CCC 2017, 2017, 196 : 286 - 293
  • [10] Drone selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Khan, Muhammad Sohaib
    Shah, Syed Irtiza Ali
    Javed, Ali
    Qadri, Nafees Mumtaz
    Hussain, Nadeem
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 INTERNATIONAL BHURBAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES (IBCAST), 2021, : 256 - 270