Effects of numerical information on intention to participate in cervical screening among women offered HPV vaccination: a randomised study

被引:8
|
作者
Hestbech, Mie Sara [1 ,2 ]
Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte [3 ,4 ]
Kragstrup, Jakob [1 ,2 ]
Siersma, Volkert [1 ,2 ]
Brodersen, John [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Oster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Publ Hlth, Sect Gen Practice, Oster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, COHERE, Dept Econ & Business, Odense M, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark, COHERE, Dept Publ Hlth, Odense M, Denmark
[5] Primary Hlth Care Res Unit, Odense, Zealand Region, Denmark
关键词
Cervical screening; HPV vaccination; medical prevention; cancer screening; informed choice; medical decision-making; general practice; Denmark; INFORMED CHOICE; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; RISK COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE; TRIAL; CANCER; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1080/02813432.2016.1249056
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To investigate the effects of different types of information about benefits and harms of cervical screening on intention to participate in screening among women in the first cohorts offered human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination. Design: Randomised survey study. Setting: Denmark. Subjects: A random sample of women from the birth cohorts 1993, 1994 and 1995 drawn from the general population. Interventions: A web-based questionnaire and information intervention. We randomised potential respondents to one of the following four different information modules about benefits and harms of cervical screening: no information; non-numerical information; and two numerical information modules. Moreover, we provided HPV-vaccinated women in one of the arms with numerical information about benefits and harms in two steps: firstly, information without consideration of HPV vaccination and subsequently information conditional on HPV vaccination. Main outcome measure: Self-reported intention to participate in cervical screening. Results: A significantly lower proportion intended to participate in screening in the two groups of women receiving numerical information compared to controls with absolute differences of 10.5 (95% CI: 3.3-17.6) and 7.7 (95% CI: 0.4-14.9) percentage points, respectively. Among HPV-vaccinated women, we found a significantly lower intention to participate in screening after numerical information specific to vaccinated women (OR of 0.38). Conclusions: Women are sensitive to numerical information about the benefits and harms of cervical screening. Specifically, our results suggest that HPV-vaccinated women are sensitive to information about the expected changes in benefits and harms of cervical screening after implementation of HPV vaccination..
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 419
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How does HPV vaccination status relate to risk perceptions and intention to participate in cervical screening? a survey study
    Hestbech, Mie Sara
    Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte
    Kragstrup, Jakob
    Siersma, Volkert
    Brodersen, John
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 16
  • [2] How does HPV vaccination status relate to risk perceptions and intention to participate in cervical screening? a survey study
    Mie Sara Hestbech
    Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
    Jakob Kragstrup
    Volkert Siersma
    John Brodersen
    BMC Public Health, 16
  • [3] Danish method study on cervical screening in women offered HPV vaccination as girls (Trial23). a study protocol
    Thamsborg, Lise Holst
    Andersen, Berit
    Larsen, Lise Grupe
    Christensen, Jette
    Johansen, Tonje
    Hariri, Jalil
    Christiansen, Sanne
    Rygaard, Carsten
    Lynge, Elsebeth
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (05):
  • [4] Cervical Dysplasia Screening and HPV Vaccination Among Women with Crohn's Disease
    Gaidos, Jill K. J.
    Valentine, John F.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2012, 21 (04) : 9 - 10
  • [5] HPV vaccination: Intention to participate among female senior high school students in Ghana
    Ampofo, Ama Gyamfua
    Mackenzie, Lisa
    Boyes, Allison W.
    VACCINE, 2023, 41 (01) : 159 - 169
  • [6] Barriers and facilitators to a combined strategy of HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening among Mexican women
    Leon-Maldonado, Leith
    Cabral, Alejandra
    Pages, Gabriela
    Brown, Brandon
    Allen-Leigh, Betania
    Lazcano-Ponce, Eduardo
    Bosch, Francesc Xavier
    Spiegelman, Donna
    Torres-Ibarra, Leticia
    Hernandez-Ramirez, Raul U.
    Egger, Emilie
    Rivera-Paredez, Berenice
    Salmeron, Jorge
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2025, 21 (01)
  • [7] Intention to Pay for HPV Vaccination among Women of Childbearing Age in Vietnam
    Xuan Thi Thanh Le
    Phuong Thi Ngoc Nguyen
    Toan Thi Thanh Do
    Thang Huu Nguyen
    Huong Thi Le
    Cuong Tat Nguyen
    Giang Hai Ha
    Chi Linh Hoang
    Bach Xuan Tran
    Latkin, Carl A.
    Ho, Roger C. M.
    Ho, Cyrus S. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (09)
  • [8] Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women's willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening
    Adab, P
    Marshall, T
    Rouse, A
    Randhawa, B
    Sangha, H
    Bhangoo, N
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2003, 57 (08) : 589 - 593
  • [9] Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial
    Canfell, Karen
    Caruana, Michael
    Gebski, Val
    Darlington-Brown, Jessica
    Heley, Stella
    Brotherton, Julia
    Gertig, Dorota
    Jennett, Chloe J.
    Farnsworth, Annabelle
    Tan, Jeffrey
    Wrede, C. David
    Castle, Philip E.
    Saville, Marion
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (09):
  • [10] Vaccination against HPV: indications for women and the impact on the cervical screening programme
    Heideman, D. A. M.
    Snijders, P. J. F.
    Berkhof, J.
    Verheijen, R. H. M.
    Helmerhorst, T. J. M.
    Meijera, C. J. L. M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (08) : 938 - 946