A "distance"-based concept of automaton for human-robot interaction

被引:0
|
作者
Ma, R [1 ]
Kaber, DB [1 ]
Chow, MY [1 ]
Currie, N [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
human-robot interaction; automation; supervisory control; telerobots; dynamic environments;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Although supervisory control scenarios have attracted significant research attention for nearly half a century, this general type of automation may not be representative of the next generation of automated or semi-autonomous systems (e.g., mobile-telerobotic systems). Such systems will be developed in the context of teams of people working with teams of robots in dynamic and uncertain environments through many different roles, not limited to supervisory control. There is a need to develop a new general concept of automation for contemporary complex automated systems to model such systems, define the roles of human operators and attempt to explain and predict systems performance. We propose a "distance"-based concept of automation that can be used to describe various forms of human-robot interaction. As the physical distance between a human operator and remote robotic work package increases, there is also an increased likelihood of spatial/temporal perturbations influencing system performance; thus, higher levels of automation are required to deal with such disturbances. This concept can be used to develop a hierarchical representation of complex human-robot interaction scenarios, and to classify various forms of automation in existing human-robot interaction applications.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 64
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fuzzy Automaton based Human-Robot Interaction
    Kovacs, Szilveszter
    Vincze, David
    Gacsi, Marta
    Miklosi, Adam
    Korondi, Peter
    2010 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED MACHINE INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATICS, 2010, : 165 - +
  • [2] Special Issue on Human-Robot Interaction in Close Distance
    Shiomi, Masahiro
    Sumioka, Hidenobu
    Ishiguro, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS AND MECHATRONICS, 2020, 32 (01) : 7 - 7
  • [3] How social distance shapes human-robot interaction
    Kim, Yunkyung
    Mutlu, Bilge
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2014, 72 (12) : 783 - 795
  • [4] Engagement: A Traceable Motivational Concept in Human-Robot Interaction
    Drejing, Karl
    Thill, Serge
    Hemeren, Paul
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENT INTERACTION (ACII), 2015, : 956 - 961
  • [5] Human-Robot Interaction in Concept Acquisition: a computational model
    de Greeff, Joachim
    Delaunay, Frederic
    Belpaeme, Tony
    2009 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING, 2009, : 168 - 173
  • [6] Human-Robot Interaction Based on Biosignals
    Liu, Yang
    Yang, Chenguang
    Wang, Min
    2020 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS (ISAS), 2020, : 58 - 63
  • [7] Human-Robot Interaction
    Jia, Yunyi
    Zhang, Biao
    Li, Miao
    King, Brady
    Meghdari, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS, 2018, 2018
  • [8] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sidobre, Daniel
    Broquere, Xavier
    Mainprice, Jim
    Burattini, Ernesto
    Finzi, Alberto
    Rossi, Silvia
    Staffa, Mariacarla
    ADVANCED BIMANUAL MANIPULATION: RESULTS FROM THE DEXMART PROJECT, 2012, 80 : 123 - +
  • [9] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sethumadhavan, Arathi
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2012, 20 (03) : 27 - +
  • [10] Human-robot interaction
    Murphy R.R.
    Nomura T.
    Billard A.
    Burke J.L.
    IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2010, 17 (02): : 85 - 89