Content analysis of the leading general academic databases

被引：21

作者：

Blessinger, K ^{[1
]}

Olle, M ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Louisiana State Univ Lib, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA

来源：

LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES | 2004年 / 28卷 / 03期

关键词：

aggregate databases; subject coverage; full-text; database comparison;

D O I：

10.1016/j.lcats.2004.05.001

中图分类号：

G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];

学科分类号：

1205 ; 120501 ;

摘要：

Title lists from the three leading general academic databases were compared to evaluate journal content. Some of the elements that were analyzed include subject coverage, the quality of titles provided, accessibility issues, and trends over time for these databases. While database title lists are now readily available on the Internet for comparison, as our article illustrates, these lists need further evaluation for proper assessment. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：335 / 346

页数：12

共 12 条

[1]

Albanese AR, 2002, LIBR J, V127, P34

[2] An assessment of social sciences coverage by four prominent pull-text online aggregated journal packages [J].

Black, S .

LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES, 1999, 23 (04) :411-419

[3]

Blessinger K., 2003, SERIALS LIBR, V45, P53, DOI [DOI 10.1300/J123v45n01_06, 10.1300/J123v45n01_06]

[4]

Grzeszkiewicz A, 1996, DATABASE, V19, P59

[5]

HASAN M, 2004, COMMUNICATION 0520

[6]

HAWKWOOD B, 2004, COMMUNICATION 0513

[7]

HILL JB, 2001, ISSUES SCI TECHNOLOG, V30

[8]

KRUMENAKER L, 2001, SEARCHER, V9, P40

[9]

ORENSTEIN RM, 1993, DATABASE, V16, P14

[10]

PAGELL R, 1987, DATABASE, V10, P33

← 1 2 →