Comparative assessments on wastewater treatment technologies for potential of wastewater recycling

被引:7
|
作者
Loh, Zhang Zhan [1 ]
Zaidi, Nur Syamimi [1 ,2 ]
Yong, Ee Ling [1 ]
Anshori, Mohamad Yusak [3 ]
Al-Kahtani, Abdullah A. [4 ]
Boopathy, Raj [5 ]
Ratnasari, Anisa [6 ]
Syafiuddin, Achmad [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia UTM, Fac Engn, Sch Civil Engn, Johor Baharu 81310, Johor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Ctr Environm Sustainabil & Water Secur IPASA, Utm Johor Bahru 81310, Johor, Malaysia
[3] Univ Nandlatul Ulama Surabaya, Dept Management, Surabaya 60237, East Java, Indonesia
[4] King Saud Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Chem, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[5] Nicholls State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Thibodaux, LA 70310 USA
[6] Inst Teknol Sepuluh Nopember, Dept Phys, Surabaya 60111, East Java, Indonesia
[7] Univ Nandlatul Ulama Surabaya, Dept Publ Hlth, Surabaya 60237, East Java, Indonesia
关键词
Wastewater recycling; Wastewater treatment technologies; Comparative assessment; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; SAND FILTRATION; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; COST; CARBON; OXIDATION;
D O I
10.5004/dwt.2022.28527
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Wastewater recycling plays an important role in minimizing water loss. The recycled wastewater can be utilized for many purposes from irrigation to portable water supply. Numbers of wastewater treatment system have been applied in Malaysia to achieve quality in meeting the intended purpose of wastewater recycling. Although there are many studies reported on the efficiency of the treatment technologies, comparative assessments including the significant purpose until the estimation of operational expenditure for each of the treatment technologies are lacking. Therefore, this brief review aims to critically discuss each of the treatment technologies from the secondary treatments, tertiary treatments, to the advanced treatments. Based on our review, the conventional activated sludge system has high potential for wastewater recycling due to lower cost in terms of population equivalent and shows great removal efficiency among secondary treatment while sand filtration and activated carbon is the better options for tertiary and advanced treatment. Therefore, it can be concluded that conventional activated sludge system, sand filtrations and activated carbon process is the most feasible in terms of removal performance and cost effectiveness for secondary, tertiary and advanced treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 158
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Advanced Membrane Technologies for Wastewater Treatment and Recycling
    Lin, Hongjun
    Zhang, Meijia
    MEMBRANES, 2023, 13 (06)
  • [2] Comparative Analysis of Wastewater Treatment Technologies
    Yahya, Mukhtar Nuhu
    Gokcekus, Huseyin
    Ozsahin, Dilber Uzun
    JURNAL KEJURUTERAAN, 2020, 32 (02): : 221 - 230
  • [3] Technologies for domestic wastewater recycling
    Jefferson, B.
    Laine, A.
    Parsons, S.
    Stephenson, T.
    Judd, S.
    Urban Water, 2000, 1 (04): : 285 - 292
  • [4] The value of fracking wastewater treatment and recycling technologies in North Dakota
    Hearne, Robert
    Shakya, Sumadhur
    Yin, Qingqing
    JOURNAL OF WATER REUSE AND DESALINATION, 2015, 5 (02): : 211 - 222
  • [5] Trend study: technologies for the recycling of wastewater
    Hernandez, Jiraleiska
    Villanueva, Samuel
    Henriquez, Magaly
    INGENIERIA UC, 2019, 26 (02): : 223 - 232
  • [6] A Comparative Analysis of Odour Treatment Technologies in Wastewater Treatment Plants
    Estrada, Jose M.
    Kraakman, N. J. R. Bart
    Munoz, Raul
    Lebrero, Raquel
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (03) : 1100 - 1106
  • [7] Wastewater in the food industry: Treatment technologies and reuse potential
    Shrivastava, Vaibhav
    Ali, Izba
    Marjub, Makid Maskawat
    Rene, Eldon R.
    Florencia Soto, Ailen Maria
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 293
  • [8] Effective wastewater treatment/recycling technologies for construction industry - A local experience
    Wong, KSW
    ADVANCES IN BUILDING TECHNOLOGY, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 1423 - 1430
  • [9] Potential of natural treatment technologies for wastewater management in India
    Starkl, M.
    Amerasinghe, P.
    Essl, L.
    Jampani, M.
    Kumar, D.
    Asolekar, S. R.
    JOURNAL OF WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 3 (04) : 500 - 511
  • [10] Assessing the feasibility of wastewater recycling and treatment efficiency of wastewater treatment units
    Jie-Chung Lou
    Yung-Chang Lin
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2008, 137 : 471 - 479