A nomogram to predict Gleason sum upgrading of clinically diagnosed localized prostate cancer among Chinese patients

被引:30
|
作者
Wang, Jin-You [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Yao [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Chao-Fu [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Shi-Lin [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Ye, Ding-Wei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Urol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Pathol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; neoplasm staging; nomograms; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOPSY; RADIOTHERAPY; PROBABILITY;
D O I
10.5732/cjc.013.10137
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Although several models have been developed to predict the probability of Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens, most of these models are restricted to prostate-specific antigen screening-detected prostate cancer. This study aimed to build a nomogram for the prediction of Gleason sum upgrading in clinically diagnosed prostate cancer. The study cohort comprised 269 Chinese prostate cancer patients who underwent prostate biopsy with a minimum of 10 cores and were subsequently treated with radical prostatectomy. Of all included patients, 220 (81.8%) were referred with clinical symptoms. The prostate-specific antigen level, primary and secondary biopsy Gleason scores, and clinical T category were used in a multivariate logistic regression model to predict the probability of Gleason sum upgrading. The developed nomogram was validated internally. Gleason sum upgrading was observed in 90 (33.5%) patients. Our nomogram showed a bootstrap-corrected concordance index of 0.789 and good calibration using 4 readily available variables. The nomogram also demonstrated satisfactory statistical performance for predicting significant upgrading. External validation of the nomogram published by Chun et al. in our cohort showed a marked discordance between the observed and predicted probabilities of Gleason sum upgrading. In summary, a new nomogram to predict Gleason sum upgrading in clinically diagnosed prostate cancer was developed, and it demonstrated good statistical performance upon internal validation.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 248
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and External Validation of a Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Significant Gleason Sum Upgrading among Japanese Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer
    Imamoto, Takashi
    Utsumi, Takanobu
    Takano, Makoto
    Komaru, Atsushi
    Fukasawa, Satoshi
    Suyama, Takahito
    Kawamura, Koji
    Kamiya, Naoto
    Miura, Junichiro
    Suzuki, Hiroyoshi
    Ueda, Takeshi
    Ichikawa, Tomohiko
    PROSTATE CANCER, 2011, 2011
  • [2] External Validation of a Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Prostate Cancer Gleason Sum Upgrading Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology Among Japanese Patients
    Imamoto, Takashi
    Suzuki, Hiroyoshi
    Utsumi, Takanobu
    Takano, Makoto
    Suyama, Takahito
    Kawamura, Koji
    Kamiya, Naoto
    Naya, Yukio
    Ueda, Takeshi
    Ichikawa, Tomohiko
    UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (02) : 404 - 410
  • [3] Predictive Factors of Gleason Score Upgrading in Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Diagnosed by Prostate Biopsy
    Moon, Seung Jin
    Park, Sung Yul
    Lee, Tchun Yong
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (10) : 677 - 682
  • [4] External Validation of a Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Prostate Cancer Gleason Sum Upgrading Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology Among Japanese Patients REPLY
    Imamoto, Takashi
    UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (02) : 410 - 411
  • [5] Gleason score inflation in patients treated for clinically localized prostate cancer at Rigshospitalet
    Roder, M. A.
    Brasso, K.
    Iversen, P.
    APMIS, 2012, 120 : 8 - 8
  • [6] CREATION OF A NOMOGRAM FOR PREDICTING GLEASON SUM UPGRADING IN POTENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR ACTIVESURVEILLANCE OF PRESUMED LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Shaikh, Nusrat
    Mishra, Nishant
    Brooks, Danielle
    Huang, Michael
    Mohan, Sanjay
    Khanna, Abhinav
    Durand, Matthieu
    Srivastava, Abhishek
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Grover, Sonal
    Tan, Gerlad
    Leung, Robert
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A225 - A226
  • [7] THE NUMBER OF BIOPSY CORES REPRESENTS ONE OF THE FOREMOST PREDICTOR OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT GLEASON SUM UPGRADING IN LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Gallina, Andrea
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Briganti, Alberto
    Scattoni, Vincenzo
    Roscigno, Vincenzo
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 175 - 175
  • [8] THE NUMBER OF BIOPSY CORES REPRESENTS ONE OF THE FOREMOST PREDICTOR OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT GLEASON SUM UPGRADING IN LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS
    Capitanio, U.
    Briganti, A.
    Gallina, A.
    Suardi, N.
    Jeldres, C.
    Isbam, H.
    Da Pozzo, L. F.
    Karakiewicz, P., I
    Montorsi, F.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 8 (04) : 276 - 276
  • [9] CAN WE USE PREOPERATIVE PSA KINETICS TO PREDICT PATHOLOGIC UPGRADING IN CONTEMPORARY PATIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH GLEASON 6 PROSTATE CANCER?
    Krane, Louis S.
    Kaul, Sanjeev
    Siddiqui, Sameer
    Bhandari, Mahendra
    Peabody, James O.
    Menon, Mani
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 55 - 55
  • [10] Radiation versus surgery in patients with clinically localized Gleason 9–10 prostate cancer
    Boda Guo
    Ming Liu
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 303 - 304