Assessing the readability and patient comprehension of rheumatology medicine information sheets: a cross-sectional Health Literacy Study

被引:55
|
作者
Oliffe, Michael [1 ]
Thompson, Emma [2 ]
Johnston, Jenny [3 ]
Freeman, Dianne [1 ]
Bagga, Hanish [1 ]
Wong, Peter K. K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mid North Coast Arthrit Clin, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Rural Clin Sch, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia
[3] Southern Cross Univ, Sch Educ, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
EDUCATION MATERIALS; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; ARTHRITIS; COMMUNICATION; INSTRUCTIONS; PICTOGRAMS; DIFFICULTY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024582
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Patients are often provided with medicine information sheets (MIS). However, up to 60% of patients have low health literacy. The recommended readability level for health-related information is <= grade 8. We sought to assess the readability of MIS given to patients by rheumatologists in Australia, the UK and Canada and to examine Australian patient comprehension of these documents. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Community-based regional rheumatology practice. Participants Random sample of patients attending the rheumatology practice. Outcome measures Readability of MIS was assessed using readability formulae (Flesch Reading Ease formula, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook scale, FORCAST (named after the authors FORd, CAylor, STicht) and the Gunning Fog scale). Literal comprehension was assessed by asking patients to read various Australian MIS and immediately answer five simple multiple choice questions about the MIS. Results The mean (+/- SD) grade level for the MIS from Australia, the UK and Canada was 11.6 +/- 0.1, 11.8 +/- 0.1 and 9.7 +/- 0.1 respectively. The Flesch Reading Ease score for the Australian (50.8 +/- 0.6) and UK (48.5 +/- 1.5) MIS classified the documents as 'fairly difficult' to 'difficult'. The Canadian MIS (66.1 +/- 1.0) were classified as 'standard'. The five questions assessing comprehension were correctly answered by 9/21 patients for the adalimumab MIS, 7/11 for the methotrexate MIS, 6/28 for the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory MIS, 10/11 for the prednisone MIS and 13/24 for the abatacept MIS. Conclusions The readability of MIS used by rheumatologists in Australia, the UK and Canada exceeds grade 8 level. This may explain why patient literal comprehension of these documents may be poor. Simpler, shorter MIS with pictures and infographics may improve patient comprehension. This may lead to improved medication adherence and better health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ASSESSING THE READABILITY AND PATIENT COMPREHENSION OF MEDICINE INFORMATION SHEETS PROVIDED TO PATIENTS BY AUSTRALIAN RHEUMATOLOGISTS
    Oliffe, M.
    Johnston, J.
    Freeman, D.
    Bagga, H.
    Wong, P. K.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2017, 76 : 429 - 429
  • [2] ASSESSING THE READABILITY AND PATIENT COMPREHENSION OF MEDICINE INFORMATION SHEETS PROVIDED TO PATIENTS BY AUSTRALIAN RHEUMATOLOGISTS
    Oliffe, M.
    Johnston, J.
    Freeman, D.
    Bagga, H.
    Wong, P.
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2017, 47 : 22 - 22
  • [3] Health Literacy in an Orthopedic Trauma Patient Population: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Patient Comprehension
    Kadakia, Rishin J.
    Tsahakis, James M.
    Issar, Neil M.
    Archer, Kristin R.
    Jahangir, A. Alex
    Sethi, Manish K.
    Obremskey, William T.
    Mir, Hassan R.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2013, 27 (08) : 467 - 471
  • [4] Assessing the Readability of Clostridium difficile on the Internet: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Basch, Corey Hannah
    Fera, Joseph
    Garcia, Philip
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER HEALTH ON THE INTERNET, 2019, 23 (03) : 206 - 212
  • [5] Readability of online patient education material for the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a cross-sectional health literacy study
    Szmuda, T.
    Ozdemir, C.
    Ali, S.
    Singh, A.
    Syed, M. T.
    Sloniewski, P.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 185 : 21 - 25
  • [6] Mental Health Literacy and Education of Complementary Medicine Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Joanna E. Harnett
    Matthew J. Leach
    Randa Karzon
    Erica McIntyre
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2024, 51 : 217 - 225
  • [7] Mental Health Literacy and Education of Complementary Medicine Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Harnett, Joanna E.
    Leach, Matthew J.
    Karzon, Randa
    Mcintyre, Erica
    ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 51 (02) : 217 - 225
  • [8] Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Basch, Corey H.
    Ethan, Danna
    MacLean, Sarah A.
    Fera, Joseph
    Garcia, Phillip
    Basch, Charles E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2018, 12 (05) : 1665 - 1669
  • [9] Dermatology consent form readability as a barrier to comprehension and inclusivity: A cross-sectional study
    Faletsky, Adam
    Han, Jane J.
    Soliman, Yssra
    Stephens, Michael
    Li, Sara
    Lee, Karen J.
    Ko, Justin
    Mostaghimi, Arash
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 86 (02) : 478 - 480
  • [10] Information Literacy of Public Health Students in Bordeaux, France: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Lopes Vincent, Beatriz Rodrigues
    Martinez-Silveira, Martha Silvia
    Motta Pinto da Luz, Mauricio Roberto
    Mouillet, Evelyne
    Bastos Camacho, Luiz Antonio
    WORLDWIDE COMMONALITIES AND CHALLENGES IN INFORMATION LITERACY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2013, 397 : 458 - 464