Constraining snowmelt in a temperature-index model using simulated snow densities

被引:27
|
作者
Bormann, Kathryn J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Evans, Jason P. [1 ,2 ]
McCabe, Matthew F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Climate Change Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, ARC Ctr Excellence Climate Syst Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[4] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, Water Desalinat & Reuse Ctr, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Snow density; Snow modelling; Melt factor; Degree-day factor; Warm maritime snowpack dynamics; Snow depth; WINTER PRECIPITATION; WATER EQUIVALENT; MELT SIMULATIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SKI RESORTS; AUSTRALIA; VARIABILITY; RESOURCES; ENERGY; COVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.073
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Current snowmelt parameterisation schemes are largely untested in warmer maritime snowfields, where physical snow properties can differ substantially from the more common colder snow environments. Physical properties such as snow density influence the thermal properties of snow layers and are likely to be important for snowmelt rates. Existing methods for incorporating physical snow properties into temperature-index models (TIMs) require frequent snow density observations. These observations are often unavailable in less monitored snow environments. In this study, previous techniques for end-of-season snow density estimation (Bormann et al., 2013) were enhanced and used as a basis for generating daily snow density data from climate inputs. When evaluated against 2970 observations, the snow density model outperforms a regionalised density-time curve reducing biases from -0.027 g cm(-3) to -0.004 g cm(-3) (7%). The simulated daily densities were used at 13 sites in the warmer maritime snowfields of Australia to parameterise snowmelt estimation. With absolute snow water equivalent (SWE) errors between 100 and 136 mm, the snow model performance was generally lower in the study region than that reported for colder snow environments, which may be attributed to high annual variability. Model performance was strongly dependent on both calibration and the adjustment for precipitation undercatch errors, which influenced model calibration parameters by 150-200%. Comparison of the density-based snowmelt algorithm against a typical temperature-index model revealed only minor differences between the two snowmelt schemes for estimation of SWE. However, when the model was evaluated against snow depths, the new scheme reduced errors by up to 50%, largely due to improved SWE to depth conversions. While this study demonstrates the use of simulated snow density in snowmelt parameterisation, the snow density model may also be of broad interest for snow depth to SWE conversion. Overall, the study responds to recent calls for broader testing of TIMs across different snow environments, improves existing snow modelling in Australia and proposes a new method for introducing physically-based constraints on snowmelt rates in data-poor regions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:652 / 667
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of snowmelt-derived streamflow from temperature-index and modified-temperature-index snow models
    Follum, Michael L.
    Niemann, Jeffrey D.
    Fassnacht, Steven R.
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2019, 33 (23) : 3030 - 3045
  • [2] Distributed temperature-index snowmelt modelling for forested catchments
    Jost, Georg
    Moore, R. Dan
    Smith, Russell
    Gluns, David R.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2012, 420 : 87 - 101
  • [3] Comparison of Temperature-Index Snowmelt Models for Use within an Operational Water Quality Model
    Watson, Brett M.
    Putz, Gordon
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2014, 43 (01) : 199 - 207
  • [4] A radiation-derived temperature-index snow routine for the GSSHA hydrologic model
    Follum, Michael L.
    Downer, Charles W.
    Niemann, Jeffrey D.
    Roylance, Spencer M.
    Vuyovich, Carrie M.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 529 : 723 - 736
  • [5] A distributed temperature-index ice- and snowmelt model including potential direct solar radiation
    Hock, R
    JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY, 1999, 45 (149) : 101 - 111
  • [6] Comparison of Process-Based and Temperature-Index Snowmelt Modeling in SWAT
    Debele, Bekele
    Srinivasan, Raghavan
    Gosain, A. K.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2010, 24 (06) : 1065 - 1088
  • [7] Comparison of Process-Based and Temperature-Index Snowmelt Modeling in SWAT
    Bekele Debele
    Raghavan Srinivasan
    A. K. Gosain
    Water Resources Management, 2010, 24 : 1065 - 1088
  • [8] Evaluation of distributed hydrologic impacts of temperature-index and energy-based snow models
    Kumar, Mukesh
    Marks, Danny
    Dozier, Jeff
    Reba, Michele
    Winstral, Adam
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2013, 56 : 77 - 89
  • [9] Parameter sensitivity of a distributed enhanced temperature-index melt model
    Heynen, Martin
    Pellicciotti, Francesca
    Carenzo, Marco
    ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY, 2013, 54 (63) : 311 - 321
  • [10] Process-based snowmelt modeling: does it require more input data than temperature-index modeling?
    Walter, MT
    Brooks, ES
    McCool, DK
    King, LG
    Molnau, M
    Boll, J
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 300 (1-4) : 65 - 75