Developing a short-form of the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale: The Genomics Outcome Scale

被引:42
|
作者
Grant, Peter E. [1 ]
Pampaka, Maria [2 ,3 ]
Payne, Katherine [4 ]
Clarke, Angus [5 ]
McAllister, Marion [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Ctr Med Educ, Sch Med, Cardiff CF14 4XN, S Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Manchester, Dept Social Stat, Sch Social Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Dept Educ, Sch Environm Educ & Dev, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Div Populat Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Cardiff Univ, Sch Med, Div Canc & Genet, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
GCOS-24; GOS; Genetic counselling; Patient reported outcome measure; Item response theory; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; EMPOWERMENT; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.015
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) is a 24-item patient reported outcome measure for use in evaluations of genetic counselling and testing services. The aim of this study was to develop a short form of GCOS-24. The study comprised three phases. Phase I: Cognitive interviews were used to explore interpretability of GCOS-24 items and which GCOS-24 items were most valued by the target population. Phase II: The Graded Response Model was used to analyse an existing set of GCOS-24 responses (n = 395) to examine item discrimination. Phase III: Item Selection. Three principles guided the approach to item selection (i) Items with poor discriminative properties were not selected; (ii) To avoid redundancy, items capturing a similar outcome were not selected together; item information curves and cognitive interview findings were used to establish superior items. (iii) Rasch analysis was then used to determine the optimal scale. In Phase I, ten cognitive interviews were conducted with individuals affected by or at risk for a genetic condition, recruited from patient support groups. Analysis of interview transcripts identified twelve GCOS-24 items which were highly valued by participants. In Phase II, Graded Response Model item characteristic curves and item information curves were produced. In Phase III, findings from Phases I and II were used to select ten highly-valued items that perform well. Finally, items were iteratively removed and permutated to establish optimal fit statistics under the Rasch model. A six-item questionnaire with a five-point Likert Scale was produced (The Genomics Outcome Scale (GOS)). Correlation between GCOS-24 and GOS scores is high (r = 0.838 at 99% confidence), suggesting that GOS maintains the ability of GCOS-24 to capture empowerment, whilst providing a less burdensome scale for respondents. This study represents the first step in developing a preference-based measure which could be used in the evaluation of technologies and services used in genomic medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 334
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of a short 6-item form of the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale: The Genomics Outcome Scale
    Grant, P.
    Pampaka, M.
    Payne, K.
    Clarke, A.
    McAllister, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 1782 - 1782
  • [2] A validated PROM in genetic counselling: the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale
    Jan S. Voorwinden
    Mirjam Plantinga
    Wim Krijnen
    Margreet Ausems
    Nine Knoers
    Mary Velthuizen
    Erwin Birnie
    Anneke M. Lucassen
    Irene M. van Langen
    Adelita V. Ranchor
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2019, 27 : 681 - 690
  • [3] A validated PROM in genetic counselling: the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale
    Voorwinden, Jan S.
    Plantinga, Mirjam
    Krijnen, Wim
    Ausems, Margreet
    Knoers, Nine
    Velthuizen, Mary
    Birnie, Erwin
    Lucassen, Anneke M.
    van Langen, Irene M.
    Ranchor, Adelita V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 (05) : 681 - 690
  • [4] The Indonesian Values Scale: An Empirical Assessment of the Short-Form Scale
    Sihombing, Sabrina O.
    MAKARA HUMAN BEHAVIOUR STUDIES IN ASIA, 2014, 18 (02): : 97 - 108
  • [5] Development and validation of the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24)
    McAllister, Marion
    Wood, A. M.
    Dunn, G.
    Shiloh, S.
    Todd, C.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2011, 48 : S94 - S94
  • [6] Measuring outcomes from genetic counselling: Establishing the minimum clinically important difference for the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale
    Thomas, C.
    McAllister, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 732 - 732
  • [7] The Caregiver Well-Being Scale: Developing a Short-Form Rapid Assessment Instrument
    Tebb, Susan S.
    Berg-Weger, Marla
    Rubio, Doris M.
    HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK, 2013, 38 (04) : 222 - 230
  • [8] Developing and Psychometric Testing of a Short-Form Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale in Chinese Patients
    Hsu, Hui-Chun
    Chang, Yu-Hung
    Lee, Pei-Ju
    Chen, Shi-Yu
    Hsieh, Chang-Hsun
    Lee, Yau-Jiunn
    Wang, Ruey-Hsia
    JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2013, 21 (03) : 212 - 217
  • [9] An Optimal Short-form Chinese Nonrestorative Sleep Scale
    Fong, Daniel
    Li, Sha
    Wong, Janet
    Wilkinson, Kate
    Shapiro, Colin
    Choi, Edmond
    McPherson, Bradley
    Lau, Esther
    Lam, Cindy
    Huang, Lixi
    Ip, Mary
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (SUPPL 1) : S82 - S82
  • [10] Creation of a Short-Form and Brief Short-Form Version of the Coping With Children's Negative Emotions Scale
    King, Gabriella L.
    Kehoe, Christiane E.
    Havighurst, Sophie S.
    Youssef, George J.
    Macdonald, Jacqui A.
    Dunsmore, Julie C.
    Berkowitz, Tomer S.
    Westrupp, Elizabeth M.
    ASSESSMENT, 2023, 30 (06) : 1947 - 1968