Developing and validating Next Generation Science Standards-alignedlearning progression to trackthree-dimensionallearning of electrical interactions in high school physical science

被引:23
|
作者
Kaldaras, Leonora [1 ]
Akaeze, Hope [2 ]
Krajcik, Joseph [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, CREATE STEM Inst, 620 Farm Ln,Room 115, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Measurement & Quantitat Methods, E Lansing, MI USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
learning progressions; NGSS; three-dimensional learning; validity; LEARNING PROGRESSION; MOTION; IDEAS;
D O I
10.1002/tea.21672
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The Framework for K-12 science education (TheFramework) and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) emphasize the usefulness of learning progressions in helping align curriculum, instruction, and assessment to organize the learning process. TheFrameworkdefines three dimensions of science as the basis of theoretical learning progressions described in the document and used to develop NGSS. The three dimensions include disciplinary core ideas, scientific and engineering practices, and crosscutting concepts. TheFrameworkdefines three-dimensional learning (3D learning) as integrating scientific and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and disciplinary core ideas to make sense of phenomena. Three-dimensional learning leads to the development of a deep, useable understanding of big ideas that students can apply to explain phenomena and solve real-life problems. While theFrameworkdescribes the theoretical basis of 3D learning, and NGSS outlines possible theoretical learning progressions for the three dimensions across grades, we currently have very limited empirical evidence to show that a learning progression for 3D learning can be developed and validated in practice. In this paper, we demonstrate the feasibility of developing a 3D learning progression (3D LP) supported by qualitative and quantitative validity evidence. We first present a hypothetical 3D LP aligned to a previously designed NGSS-based curriculum. We further present multiple sources of validity evidence for the hypothetical 3D LP, including interview analysis and item response theory (IRT) analysis to show validity evidence for the 3D LP. Finally, we demonstrate the feasibility of using the assessment tool designed to probe levels of the 3D LP for assigning 3D LP levels to individual student answers, which is essential for the practical applicability of any LP. This work demonstrates the usefulness of validated 3D LP for organizing the learning process in the NGSS classroom, which is essential for the successful implementation of NGSS.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 618
页数:30
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Designing Computer-Supported Complex Systems Curricula for the Next Generation Science Standards in High School Science Classrooms
    Yoon, Susan A.
    Anderson, Emma
    Klopfer, Eric
    Koehler-Yom, Jessica
    Sheldon, Josh
    Schoenfeld, Ilana
    Wendel, Daniel
    Scheintaub, Hal
    Oztok, Murat
    Evans, Chad
    Goh, Sao-Ee
    SYSTEMS, 2016, 4 (04):
  • [2] Teachers' Practices in High School Chemistry Just Prior to the Adoption of the Next Generation Science Standards
    Boesdorfer, Sarah B.
    Staude, Kristin D.
    SCHOOL SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS, 2016, 116 (08) : 442 - 458
  • [3] Leading by Example for Engineering Design (LEED) to Meet Next Generation Science Standards in Middle and High School Science and Math Classes
    Lemley, Evan C.
    Melton, Bob
    Allan, Elizabeth Ann
    Armstrong, Grant M.
    Stewart, James E.
    Khandaker, Morshed
    2014 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2014,
  • [4] Developing and validating an Next Generation Science Standards-aligned construct map for chemical bonding from the energy and force perspective
    Kaldaras, Leonora
    Akaeze, Hope O.
    Krajcik, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2024, 61 (07) : 1689 - 1726
  • [5] Theory of planned behavior applied to high school chemistry teachers implementing next generation science standards
    Pierce, Anna
    Brown, Corina
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 255