Interplay effects in highly modulated stereotactic body radiation therapy lung cases treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy

被引:16
|
作者
Fernandez, Desmond J. [1 ,2 ]
Sick, Justin T. [1 ,2 ]
Fontenot, Jonas D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Mary Bird Perkins Canc Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA 70809 USA
来源
关键词
4D‐ CT; interplay; MLC; SBRT; VMAT; ORGAN MOTION; DOSIMETRIC IMPACT; RADIOTHERAPY; ACCURACY; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13028
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Interplay effects in highly modulated stereotactic body radiation therapy lung cases treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy. Purpose To evaluate the influence of tumor motion on dose delivery in highly modulated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods 4D-CT imaging data of the quasar respiratory phantom were acquired, using a GE Lightspeed 16-slice CT scanner, while the phantom reproduced patient specific respiratory traces. Flattening filter-free (FFF) dual-arc VMAT treatment plans were created on the acquired images in Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system. Each plan was generated with varying levels of complexity characterized by the modulation complexity score. Static and dynamic measurements were delivered to GafChromic EBT3 film inside the respiratory phantom using an Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator. The treatment prescription was 10 Gy per fraction for 5 fractions. Comparisons of the planned and delivered dose distribution were performed using Radiological Imaging Technology (RIT) software. Results For the motion amplitudes and periods studied, the interplay effect is insignificant to the GTV coverage. The mean dose deviations between the planned and delivered dose distribution never went below -2.00% and a minimum dose difference of -5.05% was observed for a single fraction. However for amplitude of 2 cm, the dose error could be as large as 20.00% near the edges of the PTV at increased levels of complexity. Additionally, the modulation complexity score showed an ability to provide information related to dose delivery. A correlation value (R) of 0.65 was observed between the complexity score and the gamma passing rate for GTV coverage. Conclusions As expected, respiratory motion effects are most evident for large amplitude respirations, complex fields, and small field margins. However, under all tested conditions target coverage was maintained.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 69
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of robustness of volumetric modulated arc therapy and dynamic conformal arc therapy for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Teague, Kathlina M.
    Miller, Daniel C.
    Nyamwanda, Jacqueline A.
    Prichard, Hugh A.
    Kirk, Michael C.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2022, 47 (01) : 110 - 110
  • [2] Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Initial Clinical Experience
    Matuszak, M.
    Yan, D.
    Grills, I.
    Martinez, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S723 - S724
  • [3] Dynamic conformal arcs for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy: A comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Bokrantz, Rasmus
    Wedenberg, Minna
    Sandwall, Peter
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (01): : 103 - 109
  • [4] Radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Wu, Kan
    Xu, Xiao
    Li, Xiadong
    Wang, Jiahao
    Zhu, Lucheng
    Chen, Xueqin
    Wang, Bing
    Zhang, Minna
    Xia, Bing
    Ma, Shenglin
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 (12) : 6531 - 6539
  • [5] Dosimetric Study of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in Early Stage Lung Cancer
    Ahmad, I.
    Yah, R.
    Quinn, K.
    Seebach, A.
    Wang, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3411 - 3411
  • [6] Intrafraction Motion in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Rossi, Maddalena M. G.
    Peulen, Heike M. U.
    Belderbos, Jose S. A.
    Sonke, Jan-Jakob
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (02): : 835 - 843
  • [7] Comparing Lung Dosimetry and Secondary Malignancy Risks Associated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), Coplanar Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), and Noncoplanar Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Techniques
    Ng, J.
    Horowitz, D. P.
    Yan, P.
    Schweizer, M.
    Feng, W.
    Chao, K.
    Brenner, D. J.
    Hei, T. K.
    Shuryak, I.
    Cheng, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S588 - S588
  • [8] Minimizing dose variation from the interplay effect in stereotactic radiation therapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy for lung cancer
    Kubo, Kazuki
    Monzen, Hajime
    Tamura, Mikoto
    Hirata, Makoto
    Ishii, Kentaro
    Okada, Wataru
    Nakahara, Ryuta
    Kishimoto, Shun
    Kawamorita, Ryu
    Nishimura, Yasumasa
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (02): : 121 - 127
  • [9] Efficient Treatment Delivery of Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
    Comsa, D. C.
    Purdie, T. G.
    Chao, J.
    Moseley, D. J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (09) : 4320 - 4320
  • [10] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for liver stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy
    Thibault, Isabelle
    Wronski, Matt
    Korol, Renee
    Chu, William
    Helou, Joelle
    Erler, Darby
    Chung, Hans T.
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 5 (01) : 63 - 69