Enforcement of Chinese Insider Trading Law: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective

被引:8
|
作者
Huang, Robin Hui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Law, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW | 2020年 / 68卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ajcl/avaa018
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This Article conducts the first comprehensive and systematic empirical analysis of all relevant insider trading cases in China from the birth of Chinese securities markets in the early 1990s until mid-2017, shedding light on the way in which China's insider trading law has been enforced by the regulator and criminal courts in practice. First, the Article generates descriptive statistics on features of insider trading cases, such as the total number of cases over the study period, the temporal distribution of the cases, the identity of the insider, and the nature of the insider information. Second, it measures the intensity of insider trading enforcement and compares the Chinese situation with six overseas jurisdictions, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Singapore, and Hong Kong. Third, using multiple regression analyses, it identifies potential factors determining the administrative and criminal penalties for insider trading. The results of the empirical study indicate that China has significantly stepped up its efforts to crack down on insider trading in recent years, resulting in a sharp increase in insider trading cases, particularly criminal cases since 2008. While the Chinese insider trading law was essentially transplanted from overseas jurisdictions, its; enforcement has exhibited distinctive features in its local environment. Judging by the type, magnitude, and frequency of the sanctions imposed, the intensity of insider trading enforcement in China seems to be at a level comparable to relevant jurisdictions overseas. Administrative and criminal penalties against insider trading are found to be significantly influenced by some factors, notably the amount of illegal proceeds, the magnitude of social impact, the presence of mitigating circumstances, and whether the trader used others' accounts to trade. The hope is that the empirical findings will help inform the policy debate over the regulation of insider trading in China and beyond.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 575
页数:59
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Administrative Enforcement of Insider Trading in China: An Empirical Study
    Yang, Zhang
    Godwin, Andrew
    COMPANY AND SECURITIES LAW JOURNAL, 2022, 39 (02): : 110 - 137
  • [2] Who is an Insider? A Case Study on Chinese Insider Trading Enforcement Principles
    Weng, Charlie Xiao-chuan
    ASIA PACIFIC LAW REVIEW, 2014, 22 (01) : 85 - 101
  • [3] An empirical comparison of insider trading enforcement in Canada and the United States
    Anand, Anita
    Choi, Stephen J.
    Pritchard, A. C.
    Puri, Poonam
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 57 : 49 - 59
  • [4] Insider trading law enforcement and gross spreads of ADR IPOs
    Chen, Hsuan-Chi
    Hao, Qing
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2011, 35 (08) : 1907 - 1917
  • [5] Insider trading enforcement in Australia
    Lei, Victor
    Ramsay, Ian
    LAW AND FINANCIAL MARKETS REVIEW, 2014, 8 (03): : 214 - 226
  • [6] The information content of registered insider trading under lax law enforcement
    Wisniewski, TP
    Bohl, MT
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2005, 25 (02) : 169 - 185
  • [7] Insider Trading Enforcement & Link Prediction
    Van Osselaer, Andrew P.
    TEXAS LAW REVIEW, 2017, 96 (02) : 399 - 424
  • [8] The optimal enforcement of insider trading regulations
    DeMarzo, PM
    Fishman, MJ
    Hagerty, KM
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1998, 106 (03) : 602 - 632
  • [9] The optimal enforcement of insider trading regulations
    DeMarzo, PM
    Fishman, MJ
    Hagerty, KM
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 1996, 5 (02) : 219 - 219
  • [10] The Challenges of Detection and Enforcement of Insider Trading
    Brian J. Adams
    Tod Perry
    Colin Mahoney
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 153 : 375 - 388