Knowledge, Proximity and R&D Exodus

被引:10
|
作者
Livanis, Grigorios [1 ]
Lamin, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
Agglomeration externalities; Knowledge spillovers; Crowding out; Research and development (R&D); Emerging economies; Firm exit; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; PRODUCTIVITY SPILLOVERS; DOMESTIC FIRMS; MULTINATIONAL-ENTERPRISES; AGGLOMERATION ECONOMIES; DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER; LOCATION CHOICE; LOCAL FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.002
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We explore not only how technological leaders and laggards react to agglomeration, but within an agglomeration we look at how the relative presence of other leaders, laggards and foreign firms affects these firms. Existing literature argues that technological leaders experience net knowledge outflows and are therefore losers in agglomerations. However, we do not know if they avoid locations with laggards more so than locations with leaders or vice versa, thus we examine how the relative presence of each affects leaders' location decisions. For technologically lagging firms, we argue they will prefer locations with leaders over locations with laggards. We further posit that an increasing presence of foreign firms will have a particularly detrimental effect on technologically leading domestic firms, as these lose out in the contest for talent. Contextualized in an emerging market with weak intellectual property rights protection, we examine whether these concerns about knowledge spillovers and competition for talent prompt firms to close their R&D facilities or remain open. Using 5798 observations of R&D laboratories in India during 2003-2011, we find that while technologically leading firms are more likely to close their R&D facilities as the presence of other domestic labs increases, laggards are less likely to do so. These findings suggest concerns over knowledge spillovers are present, especially on the part of technologically leading firms. Moreover, leaders are more concerned by the presence of other leaders. Technologically lagging firms, by contrast, are less likely to close R&D facilities in the face of these concerns and will prefer staying near leaders over laggards. Finally, we find evidence of foreign firms crowding out domestic technological leaders but not laggards in the competition for talent. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 26
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The influence of proximity and knowledge base on recombination innovation in R&D collaboration
    Nan, Ding
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (02):
  • [2] Similarity of R&D activities, physical proximity, and R&D spillovers
    Deltas, George
    Karkalakos, Sotiris
    REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2013, 43 (01) : 124 - 131
  • [3] R&D collaborations and the role of proximity
    Marek, Philipp
    Titze, Mirko
    Fuhrmeister, Clemens
    Blum, Ulrich
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2017, 51 (12) : 1761 - 1773
  • [4] The role of geographic and cognitive proximity in knowledge networks: The case of joint R&D projects
    Kveton, Viktor
    Novotny, Josef
    Blazek, Jiri
    Marek, David
    PAPERS IN REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2022, 101 (02) : 351 - +
  • [5] Proximity and localisation of corporate R&D activities
    Carrincazeaux, C
    Lung, YN
    Rallet, A
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2001, 30 (05) : 777 - 789
  • [6] R&D knowledge is power
    Henard, David H.
    McFadyen, M. Ann
    RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2006, 49 (03) : 41 - 47
  • [7] The impact of R&D incentives and sectoral knowledge stocks on R&D outcomes
    Akad, Ipek
    Deger, Cagacan
    ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 33 (04) : 550 - 585
  • [8] R&D employee training, the stock of technological knowledge, and R&D productivity
    Kim, Donggyu
    Lee, Chang-Yang
    R & D MANAGEMENT, 2022, 52 (05) : 801 - 819
  • [10] Knowledge specialization and R&D collaboration
    Mauro Caminati
    Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2016, 26 : 247 - 270