Smart learning adoption in employees and HRD managers

被引:30
作者
Lee, Junghwan [1 ]
Zo, Hangjung [1 ]
Lee, Hwansoo [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Business & Technol Management, Taejon, South Korea
[2] Dankook Univ, Interdisciplinary Grad Program IT LAW, Yongin 448701, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
ACCEPTANCE; PLS; PERSONALIZATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/bjet.12210
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The innovation of online technologies and the rapid diffusion of smart devices are changing workplace learning environment. Smart learning, as emerging learning paradigm, enables employees' learning to take place anywhere and anytime. Workplace learning studies, however, have focused on traditional e-learning environment, and they have failed to capture the features of new learning environment and prove its impact on the adoption. As a result, they have failed to align educational needs of employee and technology-oriented approach of organisation. Thus, this study addresses the differentiated characteristics of smart learning and analyse how this characteristics influence its adoption. In order to suggest the way of successful adoption, this study compares adoption behaviour of employees and HRD managers, as a learner and a coordinator of learning. The results demonstrate that mobility and personalisation of smart learning is crucial for the adoption. According to comparative analysis, the adoption behaviour of smart learning also differs in employees and HRD manager. HRD manager emphasise perceived ease of use as a reason for adoption, while employees emphasise perceived usefulness. Mobility, interactivity, personalisation and collaborativeness, which are important features of smart learning, have different effects on perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness for the two groups. This analysis provides useful guidance for practice to adopt smart learning successfully.
引用
收藏
页码:1082 / 1096
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J RES CTR ED TECHNOL
[2]   The ethical and social implications of personalization technologies for e-learning [J].
Ashman, Helen ;
Brailsford, Tim ;
Cristea, Alexandra I. ;
Sheng, Quan Z. ;
Stewart, Craig ;
Toms, Elaine G. ;
Wade, Vincent .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2014, 51 (06) :819-832
[3]  
Barua A. C., 1996, J ORG COMPUTING, V5, P417, DOI DOI 10.1080/10919399509540261
[4]  
Beamish N., 2002, European Business Journal, V14, P105
[5]   Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty [J].
Bhuasiri, Wannasiri ;
Xaymoungkhoun, Oudone ;
Zo, Hangjung ;
Rho, Jae Jeung ;
Ciganek, Andrew P. .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2012, 58 (02) :843-855
[6]   A bootstrap-based strategy for spectral interval selection in PLS regression [J].
Bras, Ligia P. ;
Lopes, Marta ;
Ferreira, Ana P. ;
Menezes, Jose C. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS, 2008, 22 (11-12) :695-700
[7]   User satisfaction affecting the acceptance of an e-learning platform as a mean for the development of the human capital [J].
Capece, Guendalina ;
Campisi, Domenico .
BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 32 (04) :335-343
[8]  
Chaudhary A., 2014, INT J SCI ENG RES, V2, P77
[9]   Personalized e-learning system using item response theory [J].
Chen, CM ;
Lee, HM ;
Chen, YH .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2005, 44 (03) :237-255
[10]   The effects of organizational learning environment factors on e-learning acceptance [J].
Cheng, Bo ;
Wang, Minhong ;
Moormann, Juergen ;
Olaniran, Bolanle A. ;
Chen, Nian-Shing .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2012, 58 (03) :885-899