Romeike v. Holder: When Violation of a Human Right Is Not Grounds for Asylum

被引：1

作者：

Beougher, Mark ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Western Michigan Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA

来源：

JUSTICE SYSTEM JOURNAL | 2014年 / 35卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1080/0098261X.2014.911013

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：233 / 236

页数：4

共 19 条

[1] Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project's Shadow: When Fear Suppresses Disfavored Voices
Kimble, John
COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 2024, 57 (03): : 455 - 504
[2] A Human Right to Group Self-Identification? Reflections on Nixon v. Vancouver Rape Relief
Boyle, Christine
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF WOMEN AND THE LAW, 2011, 23 (02) : 488 - 518
[3] The Right to Suitable Prison Accommodation with Reference to the Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in Mursic v. Croatia
Zagorec, Marina
POLICIJA I SIGURNOST-POLICE AND SECURITY, 2018, 27 (04): : 407 - 434
[4] REFUSAL TO SUBMIT A QUESTION FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING BY A COURT OR TRIBUNAL OBLIGATED TO IT AND NO VIOLATION OF THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL. COMMENTARY ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE ECHR OF 24 OF APRIL 2018, CASE OF BAYDAR V. THE NETHERLANDS
Soca Torres, Isaac
REVISTA DE DERECHO COMUNITARIO EUROPEO, 2018, (61): : 1123 - 1139
[5] The International Court of Justice in Jadhav case (India v. Pakistan) and a Delayed Regulatory Coupling: Right to be informed to Consular Assistance and Human Rights
Diaz Galan, Elena C.
Bertot Triana, Harold
REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE DERECHO, 2020, (49)
[6] When Market Abuse Rules Violate Human Rights: Grande Stevens v. Italy and the Different Approaches to Double Jeopardy in Europe and the US
Marco Ventoruzzo
European Business Organization Law Review, 2015, 16 : 145 - 165
[7] When Market Abuse Rules Violate Human Rights: Grande Stevens v. Italy and the Different Approaches to Double Jeopardy in Europe and the US
Ventoruzzo, Marco
EUROPEAN BUSINESS ORGANIZATION LAW REVIEW, 2015, 16 (01) : 145 - 165
[8] DO SUPER PACS FORFEIT FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS WHEN THEY RESTRUCTURE AS HYBRID PACS? THE IMPLICATIONS OF VERMONT RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE, INC. V. SORRELL
Wozniak, Brittney
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW, 2016, 77 (03) : 411 - 440
[9] The Right to Property and the Protection of Interests in Intellectual Property - A Human Rights Perspective on the European Court of Human Rights' Decision in Anbeuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal
Beiter, Klaus D.
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2008, 39 (06) : 714 - 721
[10] Producing Discourses and Furthering Social Change in the Realms of Respect for the Dignity of Human Life, Right to Abortion and Women Rights - An Analysis on Gonzales v. Carhart
Chen, Yi-Chien
EURAMERICA, 2013, 43 (03): : 595 - 635

← 1 2 →